Reverse MIRO invoice with same WH Tax codes

[aditya_ponnala]

While entering MIRO invoice, Vendor master had only one WH Tax code. But by the time the the invoice is reversed(MR8M), vendor master has 2 WH tax codes.

Hence on the invoice, there is one WH tax line but on reversal there are two lines with two different WH tax codes.

Is it possible to reverse the MIRO invoice with same WH tax codes it was posted with?

[pankajypatil]

If you are using the WHT tax for payment then this case will arise you need to remove the tax code manully in th eposted doceumnt. And to removei incosistancy run the program RFWT0010 with the same docuemnt.

[sanilbhandari]

Hi aditya.ponnala

You have mentioned report RFWT0010 does not fall into scope of documents in your example. However, in your question you have mentioned that with holding tax were added to vendor master after the invoice was posted. This would have caused issues in WITH_ITEM and hence the report suggested by pankajypatil seems to be the right way forward.

Thanks & Regards

Sanil Bhandari

PS - If you are providing an update to an answer, it would help if you add it as a comment so that it would also be useful to others in the community to track all updates to an answer in one place.

[aditya_ponnala]

Hi Sanil,

When you say the program will correct the inconsistency, the program will sync up WH Tax codes on the reversed invoice and the invoice based on the latest on vendor master?

Thanks,
Sivaram

[pankajypatil]

before reversal, you can remove WH tax from the document if it is not posted to GL accounts.

It will be good if you share screenshots for better understanding.

[aditya_ponnala]

"If you are using the WHT tax for payment then this case will arise you need to remove the tax code manully in th eposted doceumnt"

Thanks for the reply. But do you mean the reversal document? So, one has to check WH tax code on the invoice and reversal and manually change WH tax codes? Shouldn't the system check it automatically based on what's been reported to authorities?

Incosistancy run the program RFWT0010: This does not work as the scope of documents in my example doesn't fall into the scope of the program.