cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

ORDERS05: Sold-To Party Determination based on Ship-To-Party

rahul_vishwakarma2
Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Everyone,

There is a client requirement where the Seeburger will send the Ship-To-Party information only in the IDoc segment and based on the Ship-To-Party information, we need to determine the Sold-To-Party.

Is it possible in the standard best practice? If yes, then can you please share the procedure to achieve this.

If not then what will be the other approach for this?

We are trying to map this in a standard way, need to avoid coding.

Please suggest.

Regards,

Kundan

Ryan-Crosby
Active Contributor

What happens if the ship-to party is assigned to more than one sold-to party? Keep in mind a simple statement like the following (specifically the contractual reference) as well and the fact that it's mandatory on any sales order

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Lakshmipathi
Active Contributor
0 Kudos
Under this Reliance, we have multiple distributors which are having a unique GLN and this is an actual sold-to-Party

In EDPAR table, you have two fields; one for External no. and another for Internal number. Explore this functionality. But for me, whoever is having unique GLN, that should come under External no.

Lakshmipathi
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

You can try with KNVP table or if the users maintain GLN number, then, you can also consider EDPAR table to fetch the related Sold-To

rahul_vishwakarma2
Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Lakshmipathi - Thanks for your response. But the requirement is like below.

We have a header office information like Reliance which will be having a GLN, but this is not a customer or sold-to-party. Under this Reliance, we have multiple distributors which are having a unique GLN and this is an actual sold-to-Party. This information is not been passed from the Seeburger. Even though if we maintain EDPAR, this will not go to fulfill the requirement. If possible can you please tell me at what logic we need to maintain the table?