SAP for Banking Discussions
Join the conversation about navigating compliance, enhancing customer experience, and driving growth in the banking industry with SAP.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Why BCA_CN_LINK

a142367
Explorer
0 Kudos

Can anybody tell me why SAP implemented the BCA_CN_LINK table? What was the motivation? It seems to me that this type of link table creates a single point of failure, and makes building queries to account/contract data complicated and to my mind possibly slows them down, as the BCA_CN_LINK table becomes excessivly large. Why not use the contract_int to link other table data to an account/contract? SQVI Queries are also complicated because SQVI does not allow the creation of Aliases, and you cannot add the same table twice in an SQVI join!

0 REPLIES 0