cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Fund Management BCS Availability control at F-59 Level

0 Kudos

Dear SAP Expert,

Please help me in Fund Management BCS and provide me with the solution of the below scenario.

Here as per the client requirement, they want the control on the budget at two levels:

  1. Payment budget
  2. Commitment budget

For commitment budget level I had control it at the invoice level and it is working fine.

For Payment budget level it can’t be control as the payment is being approved & made out the SAP system so we didn’t have any standard functionality where it can be controlled.

I think of a solution that as the payment is being made outside SAP system so can we use transaction F-59(which is payment request) and control the payment from this transaction.

Please let me know that is this the right way to go ahead or need any other solution.

Please suggest.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

iklovski
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

It's not clear what are your current settings in FM. Do you work with two ledgers of budgets today? If 'yes', what up date profile are you using if you say that your commitment budget is consumed with the invoice, which is highly unusual.

Regards,

Eli

0 Kudos

Hi Eli,

Thank you for your quick response.

Please check the below scenarios with examples.

In case we have posted a FB60 document.

Expenditure Account Dr. 1000 USD - Commitment Budget

Deduction Account Cr.200 USD

Account Payable Cr.800 USD – Payment Budget

My business wants expense and payable control over a single transaction and my business will payment transaction on a non SAP system.

How to budget control this scenario please let me know.

Regards,

Sarvagya

iklovski
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Well, that's my point. In all standard update profiles, an invoice (FB60) will impact payment budget rather than commitment budget, or both. You, however, say that it consumes commitment budget. So, my question is with which update profile do you work.

TammyPowlas
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

I think it would be easier to mimic running a payment run for the items paid in the outside system (e.g. transaction F110 or F110S)

Additionally then you can run program RFFMS200 to push FM items to "paid" status (e.g. value type 57)