on 05-08-2020 2:44 AM
Hi expert,
Now for SA maintenance in S4HC:
1. price must be maintained while SA creation;
2. if we remove condition type authorization in user role, user can't create SA.
Our client's demand:
Buyers are not allowed to maintain price in SA creation/change ,but they‘re responsible for creating/changing SA(exclude price).
Can we achieve this demand in S4HC?
Thanks in advance.
Hello Vijayendra,
Thank you very much for your reply.
In notes you supplied, I think user still have authorization to add/change price directly in SA, we'd like to remove this authorization, but if we remove this authorization, SA creation will fail as system will remind you have no authorization to maintain price, but for SA creation, price maintenance is mandatory。
Thanks
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Vijayendra,
Thank you very much for your reply.
We manage price of SA in a development platform, so we don't want user to change price which derive automatically as per info-record when new SA item created,or change price on SA change mode.
I tried to use 'D' as indicator of condition type,but i found I still can change price.
Thanks in advance.
Hello Teng,
Error VK250
Authorization Object: V_KOND_VEA
In ERP you could have created user specific field selection at document Level and later defining authorization for buyers via OMET to only display conditions, but this is not possible in public cloud as of now.
Where as in cloud there is standard business role "SAP_BR_PURCHASER" which has catalog "SAP_MM_BC_PC_PROCESS_MC" which provides create, change, display and delete for authorization object V_KOND_VEA, which is required for saving the OAs.
May I know which app are you using is it Manage Purchase Scheduling Agreements or Create Scheduling Agreement (ME31L)? Are you facing the issue in both the apps?
Best Regards,
Vijayendra
Hello Teng,
Role: SAP_BR_PURCHASER
Catalog: SAP_MM_BC_SA_PROCESS_MC (Materials Management - Scheduling Agreements)
--> Authorization Object: V_KOND_VEA (Maintain Condition: Auth. for Use/Appl./Cond.Type/Table)
May I know how are you enabling the condition type authorization at role? What is happening if at role it is kept as unrestricted or if you set the read only for condition type.
Addtionally as workaround you can also restrict at condition type, the possibility of manual entry using 'D' as indicator, which can be done via SSCUI 101094.
Best Regards,
Vijayendra
Hello Teng,
I have checked it and afraid this is currently not possible in standard system that user with create / change authorization for a SA can't change price as they will always be able to edit the price. There are valid business reasons why this is the default functionality as many customer's need the flexibility to adjust prices throughout the processing of transactional date.
Currently there is no BAdI available for SA for controlling the field status which can convert the field into display mode, where as same is available for PO (MM_PUR_S4_PO_FLDCNTRL_SIMPLE) and PR (MM_PUR_S4_PR_FLDCNTRL_SIMPLE) to control the fields.
Also field selection as document level cannot be modified in cloud as mentioned in my earlier reply. Hence request you to raise new feature request for this via influence.sap.com
Best Regards,
Vijayend
Hello Teng,
Price determination happens while creating scheduling agreement, if the customizing for the document type of the scheduling agreement is maintained along with master data needed.
Note:
- System carries out price determination only if the "Time-dependent conditions" indicator is deactivated.
- Make sure that you set the quantity of the first scale to the smallest order quantity to avoid not having determination of price even when the master conditions (info record, contract, scheduling agreement) contain valid prices (with scales).
Refer to below notes for more information;
456691 - FAQ: Price determination in purchasing
2117271 - Scheduling agreement price update from info record
1974012 - Determination price does not work with scheduling agreement
2502130 - Condition created for vendor not taken into scheduling agreement price
Best Regards,
Vijayendra
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
91 | |
7 | |
7 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.