cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Start Date for Planned Demand (Supply) in CTM Run (SNP)

0 Kudos

Hi Experts,

Currently facing a situation where CTM run is calculating different start date between locations and the business requirement is that all locations should start planning at 48-hour horizon.

Let me set example to make it more clear.

Assuming today is Jan 1st

LOC-A: first planned demand order " BC" Jan 3rd (GOOD!, biz requirement met)

LOC-B: first planned demand order "BC" Jan 2nd (NOT goos -biz requirement NOT met, since it's only 24 hour period, should be frozen)

There is enough stock in both locations and no external procurement/production is needed, just stock transfers.

What I'm trying to get is both locations act the same way and I want to know in which master data (Prod/loc horizon, T-Lane) or CTM parameters could these behavior be maintained and corrected.

Thanks,

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

rupesh_brahmankar3
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hello,

During the planning run CTM considers the transport duration from the transportation lane means of transport.

Please check the duration in transportation lane through transaction /SAPAPO/TL3

Best Regards,

R.Brahmankar

0 Kudos

Thanks for your answer R.Brahmankar, but it was not an issue with the transportation lane.

The issue was with SNP Stk Trn.Hor in the MAT1 transaction SNP2 tab, it was not maintained for all locations, so I just modified the value and worked as desired.

Best,

rupesh_brahmankar3
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hello,

Ok this could also a valid reason as per CTM profile setting CTM does not plan in stock transfer horizon.

As it is resolved please close the question.

Thanks

Best Regards.

R.Brahmankar

Answers (0)