cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Download Gateway trace details for multiple requests?

pokrakam
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Is it possible to download trace details for multiple requests? Using the standard trace /IWFND/TRACES tool we have to drill down into each request to get the details. But I'd like to do stuff like compute the average Gateway overhead or show the application processing time for different requests in tabular format.

Haven't found any info on the web and looking at the tables it seems to be encoded data in a RAWSTRING field.

gregorw
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Isn't that what you get in the performance trace tab of /IWFND/TRACES?

pokrakam
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

That's the top level info. From there you have to drill down into each request to get the trace details. I'm after the details for all the requests in one go.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

gregorw
Active Contributor

A long time ago I've used the Chrome HAR export (JSON), parsed that and extracted the Gateway Performance Statistics.

pokrakam
Active Contributor

Very nice blog, thanks for the tip. I didn't realise this came in the header, this is also handy to know. Our application is external though, so some coding involved for the C# guys to parse this. FWIW we're analysing load tests performed via JMeter. But I think it will come in handy.

In the meantime I've discovered it's not that difficult to extract so wrote a little utility. It would make a nice blog, but as is usual I can't post due to client confidentiality/IP rights. But I can say that with the aid of /iwfnd/cl_sutil_moni->perf_get_result( ) I can get all the info I need out of table /iwfnd/su_tperf.

pokrakam
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hmm, it looks like I can do a multiple-select and show details and select-all and go to the next level again. The only drawback is now I have all the trace details without the requests they belong to. Not perfect but I can manually patch those together in Excel assuming they're in the same sequence.

Still happy to hear if anyone has a better solution.