on 04-21-2020 12:57 PM
Hello,
we are planning to move from BPC 10.0 NW to 10.1 Embedded with BW7.50 on HANA. We understand difference Account based vs Key figure model and transition of application ownership.
I go through resources and found many articles that moving from Standard to Embedded is in fact reimplementation but when I read upgrade guide there is information:
"The information in this guide about upgrading from BPC 10.0 or 7.5 to 10.1 applies regardless of which configuration - standard or embedded - you implement in release 10.1. "
https://help.sap.com/viewer/be4075d74732423aa57b43f0dab5d7da/10.1/en-US/cd9151816e3e4ea78a4b936e1e36...
Now I am confused: does it mean that program UJT_MIGRATE_100_TO_101 will migrate our environments to Embedded model, create infoobjects and cubes (or ADSOs?). If yes can I influence infoobject naming\identification to align with stantard BW iobjects?
What about other stuff like: script -> FOX, Report\Input Forms -> BW Queries, authorizations/Team - it has to be done manually?
Regards,
Sorry, but again! THERE IS NO MIGRATION FROM STANDARD TO EMBEDDED!
And will never be.
"UJT_MIGRATE_100_TO_101 will migrate our environments to Embedded model" - NEVER!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
P.S. But what is the business requirement to move to Embedded?
@Vadin Kalinin - You have a gr8 sense of humor for sure . 🙂
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Yes, sorry to start it again as I see that was discussed several times already but this information in BPC upgrade guide is at least misleading and I needed to confirm that. As I understand this concerns upgrade step only and not migration step from guide:
"The information in this guide about upgrading from BPC 10.0 or 7.5 to 10.1 applies regardless of which configuration - standard or embedded - you implement in release 10.1. " - this
https://help.sap.com/viewer/be4075d74732423aa57b43f0dab5d7da/10.1/en-US/cd9151816e3e4ea78a4b936e1e36...
Generally we are doing technical upgrade - embedded would be better for us from technical perspective but if this means reimplementation it will not be worth it and we go for Standard model.
Thank you!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Sorry, but what do you want for confirmation? I can write a confirmation letter for you 🙂 For sure not for free - looks like free confirmation has low value!
Embedded model require full reimplementation and at the end you will get the system with very poor reporting capabilities for end user...
User | Count |
---|---|
6 | |
5 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.