cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Transferring Duty Rates back to ECC from GTS

0 Kudos

All,

Our business utilizes the duty rates in ECC today as pricing conditions. These are maintained by COO, Destination Country, and Commodity code. We have separate condition rates for percentage-based condition rates, weight-based conditions rates, and duty surchages per unit.

We use these duty rates for various reasons in ECC. Namely, deriving our standard price, accruing our pending duty spend via PO pricing conditions, paying customs via shipment cost documents, etc.

We are currently implementing GTS and will still need visibility to these duty rates but would like to avoid manually maintaining these conditions in ECC if possible. We are set up to feed the HTS/Tariff codes and descriptions via the standard programs, along with the classifications as well. We are loading tariff codes and rates from a content provider into GTS.

A few questions:
Does GTS have the ability to transfer duty rates from GTS to a feeder system (ECC) in standard programs/configuration?

If so, where is the configuration or is there a guide? I have found little on this so far in my research.

If this is not available via standard methods, what BADI's could be leveraged to send the data back to ECC?

Thanks,

Kyle

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

former_member215181
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Kyle,

No, there's no standard way to re-transfer the duty rates, so no need to keep searching!

However, GTS comes with a duty simulation calculator, and that can be called from the ERP feeder system. Some ERP versions include an example Pricing Formula (Formula 141, as I remember), which you can configure in the MM pricing schema. I wonder if that would help you?

Regards,
Dave

0 Kudos

Hi Dave,

That confirms my findings as well. I did come across this Duty simulation which may be able to be used for our purposes.

Our standard costs do still require this but we could probably devise a way to arrive at the same information.

Thanks,

Kyle

Answers (0)