on 07-08-2019 4:37 AM
Dears,
We CIF MRP Areas and Materials extended to MRP Areas to APO where they have a location type Storage Location MRP Area.
Why dont I see safety stock maintained at MRP Area Storage location in ECC in corresponding fields in MAT1?
My understanding is
Source Field: EISBE / Table: MDMA
Target Field: SAFTYC / Struc: MATIO
Is some computation / setting at CIF time not updating it?
What does the field "Relevance to APO" (APOKZ / MDMA) mean who the MRP Type X0 is already applied? In table MARC the APOKZ field is set to 3 but the materials exist in active integration models for both plants and MRP areas. So why is it not 3 in APOKZ/MDMA? There is this report RAPOKZFX but that only seems to fix at plant level and not MRP area level.
Thanks
Amit
Thanks again both
Done ALL those things mentioned. BD52 good, message type, fields all checked. No multiple int models. Ran all those RCIF* consistency reports. CFM9 multiple times. . I cant get the damn safety stock at MRP area.
And I not a programmer. I am high school drop out.. as good.
Thanks
Amit
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
CIF is at best the name of a kitchen detergent. 😉
In addition following actions helps with CIF many a times.
1. Check if you have multiple active IMs for the object, if yes make sure there is only one active IM at a time.
2. follow below sequence of events...
Deactivate the IMs for the object in question,
delete the IMs (RIMODDEL)
run RCIFIMDL (for the trouble maker Filter Object Types) with option del unused filter object types
CFM1 -> CFM2 -> RIMODINI
This has worked for me to solve many unexplained CIF issues.
Regards
Abhishek
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks Abhishek
Note 1875164 asks to run RCPTRAN4 because CFC9 Material Master send immediate changes (BTE) does not work for MRP Area Master data.
But RCPTRAN4 say no changes found. Nothing transferred. MRP Area Material Master data is NOT CIFd despite initial transfers and running all these RC* reports.
CIF is at best the name of a kitchen detergent. These settings are all over the place.
Thanks
Amit
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello,
Could you please check in in BD52 Message Type CIFMTMRPA following entry is available?
MRP_AREA MDMA-EISBE
Do you have active integration Model for MRP Areas? You can check table CIF_IMMRPA
Also do you have any enhancement for CIF? Also you can debug the CIF /SAPAPO/CIF_PROD_INBOUND
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar
Hello
Check if note 1875164 is relevant for you.
Regards
Abhishek
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks Rupesh, Did but it still does not send the Safety stock maintained at Storage location MRP Area. What could be the possible reasons? There are no CIF exits here.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello,
The field MDMA-APOKZ will not be changed by RAPOKZFX report. This report only works with MARC table for material master. 1028956 : MM03 : APOKZ indicator is displayed in MRP area.
This should solve the issue with APOKZ inconsistency if any.
Please execute report RIMODINI (initial load) for the Integration Model for Material Master Data which contains the affected Materials.
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
13 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.