Problem with meter reading history after change on logical register number(EG60)

[former_member590332]

Hi Experts,

I have a requirement were i must keep the history of meter readings from a former device that has been removed(Transaction: EG32) to be considered for estimation and validations, after a new device is installed(Transaction: EG31).

After I perform the installation with EG31, the device receive a new logical register number and does not consider the meter readings of the removed device for estimation and validations, as shown below:

Meter reading history not considered for validations:

I change the logical device number back to the last device number that has been removed by using the EG60 transaction, in hopes that by doing that, the meter reading history of the former device would be retrieved, as shown below.

Change from “2” to “1” on EG60:

As it seems, the logical number of the device installed changes correctly to the old device number:

After the change, I try to estimate the next periodic meter reading result using EL28, but I get the errors below and the meter reading historic of the former device is still not considered for validation and estimation:

Message no. EL185: Device E13I0003140D register 001: estimation could not determine a valid MR

Message no. EL262: Error reading internal table during extrapolation

Meter reading historic is not considered for validations:

Does anyone know what could be wrong with the logical number change that I made, or any ideas on how to keep the history of meter readings after a removal(EG32) and installation(EG31) of device?

[ricky_shaw · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Try to implement this BADI: ISU_SE_DEVICESMREGCRTRCO_ASYNC .

[ricky_shaw]

Hi, Actually there i a Badi that can be implemented during EG32/EG31 to synch up logical register #'s so and this will help to copy the old register data to the new one. Please take your developers help for it.

[NTeunckens]

Maybe you can trace this back to some other missing SAP-Notes by recording your actions trough Trx."ANST" (Automated Notes Search Tool cfr. SAP-Note 1818192)?

[Lakshmipathi]

For Message no. EL185, please have a look at OSS note 970708 and for Message no. EL262, have a look at OSS note 1106884

[former_member590332]

Hi Lakshmipathi, thanks for the help.

Checking on the code, both notes has already been applied on the system, but the problem still occurs:

Note: 970708

Note: 1106884

Any ideas on what else could be causing the problem?

[Lakshmipathi]

When you post a query and give further updates, please add the content under "Comments" and not under "Answer" as you were not answering to a query but only providing additional informations as asked by the members. Also, when you add the text under Comments, it will be intimated to the person to whom you are responding whereas, if you add the text under Answer, the member will not be intimated. By the way, your above answer has been converted as comment by me.