Error message FICUSTOM401 x Internal Order

[claudiolanger7_]

Dear Experts,

I ´ve been using in ES_PS, component 801 and SP-level 000. The system have been showing me the message error FICUSTOM401 FMDERIVE verificação de consistência 01 (WRX RMRP ) at MIRO when I use INTERNAL ORDER since PO. Please see the attachments.

Ps. I can create the MIRO when I use cost center in MM process (material management) without any problem.

Could you please help me?

Regards

Claudio

[gmorozco]

it is rigth, OBA5 & SM30

V_T100C in FICUSTOM Add ::

[claudiolanger7_]

Hi Eli, I´ve changed from message error to warning and the system create MIRO and its FM document correctly. I'll change again to error and debug this problem. Thanks a lot. Regards Claudio

[claudiolanger7_]

Hi Eli, I´ve read the notes:

- 2491908 - FICUSTOM401: FMDERIVE Consistency Check 01 error during WRX RMRP (it's a guidance note) 2303301 - FMDERIVE - FM Derivation Tool behavior starting on EA-PS 800 for the S/4HANA (orientação) (it´s alrealy implemented)

- 2340215 provides an additional field named ' PROCESS_DETAIL'. (it was implemented)

- 2223831 - Missing field Process Detail in FMDERIVE - Missing validation of derived FM Account Assignments when processing GR (it´s alrealy implemented).

- After implemented the note 2340215 the system enabled the field PROCESS_DETAIL (in the trace) and I configured in FMDERIVE to call the FMDT_READ_PO_ASSIGNMEN when PROCESS_DETAIL = IR_CLR (MIRO) and so the system brought the commitment item 30/3

(that´s right according to the note 2491908).

I tested and the system still show me the same error message FICUSTOM401. Do you know if there are another configurations that I need to do?

Thanks a lot.

Claudio

[claudiolanger7_]

Ps .: It's occurs when I use internal order in MM process (me51n,me51, migo and miro). When I use cost center it works.

Regards

Claudio

[iklovski]

That's strange... Obviously, something goes wrong during the derivation. Do you have some specific rule of derivation when posting on internal order? Did you check if this rule is defined properly? Maybe, you can share some screenshots... The easiest way would be, of course, setting a breakpoint on the error and see what gets wrong, but here my hands are tied 🙂

[claudiolanger7_]

Hi Eli,

Thanks for your help.

The note say “During Invoice Receipt (FMDERIVE-TRANSAC = 'RMRP'😞 Derive a commitment item value with financial transaction 30, typically the commitment item from the reference Purchase Order, that can be determined using a derivation step type Function Module (calling function FMDT_READ_PO_ASSIGNMENT) in FMDERIVE.”.

The system has been showed me this error exactly after the screen “1-fmderives-trace-before-error.png” (TRANSAC = 'RMRP') above and the commitment item has "transaction" equal 30 so it shouldn´t show me this error, right?

Thanks Claudio

[iklovski]

Hi,

Please, refer to OSS note:

2491908 - FICUSTOM401: FMDERIVE Consistency Check 01 error during WRX RMRP

Regards,

Eli