on 04-17-2019 5:54 PM
Trying to understand the risk associated with tcode CL30N. The transaction by nature is display, uses an "Execute" activity (16) in C_KLAH_BSE which is the only relevant authorization object. I have read, however, that there is inherent functionality under the "Environment -> Define Function" that may override authorization checks. I cannot accurately test this theory. Just looking to better understand the exposure in this tcode.
Authorization objects :
C_KLAH_BSE (Authorization for Finding Objects) with ACTVT=16 and
C_TCLA_BKA (Authorization for Class Types) with KLART (Class Type)= the class type you enter on screen are
the two default Authorization objects that are required to successfully run the transaction CL3N
I further checked if Environment->Define Functions does call any other authorization objects but I didn't find any other authorization objects in the authorization trace.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
14 | |
4 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.