Relation BRF + and request type on MSMP

[former_member592882]

Hi expert,

I want to know regarding relation BRF+ and Request type. Here some brief information regarding my case :

1. I'm already create1 workflow for access request on MSMP that have approval (for request Type 1 and 2)

2. I want to create new MSMP workflow for Req type 127 without approval at all. On this new workflow I dont create any stagging because I want to create 1 request type without approval.

But, every time I create request with req type 127 (role transfer)

MSMP always go to route same with req type 1 and 2 (with approval)

Did I miss something ? How I can make MSMP to detour with my new BRF+ (without approval) ?

*I'm still new with MSMP. I'm open any better suggestion how I can make some Request type without approval.

Thank you

Best Regards,

Hendy

[madhusap]

Hi Hendy,

You need to assign context parameter "ITEMNUM" to Line Item key in BRF+ decision table and this could be the reason for the error you are facing.

Regards,

Madhu

[former_member592882]

Dear Madhu,

Thank you for your response. I'm already try your sugestion to fill line item key with ITEMNUM

But, the error is still the same

I dont know why MSMP still use Z_BRF_ACCESS_REQUEST_0, even though I already create new BRF+ for specific request type.

Is something wrong with my configuration ?

Did I miss something ?

Thank you

Best Regards,

Hendy

[madhusap]

Hi Hendy,

I am not able view screenshots shared by you. Can you send again?

Regards,

Madhu

[former_member592882]

Hi Madhu,

Thank you for your help. I'm Already can solve my problem.

What I do is just use same BRF+ (Z_BRF_ACCESS_REQUEST_0) and add the rule result without any staging and direct to certain request type (127)

But, I have another issue regarding my another workflow that need approval. Every time I want to approve my access request, it's always ask username and password again ?

I'm already check my task setting, and for checkbox reaffirm approve is not active

Is there any configuration I'm missing ?

Thank you

Best Regards,

Hendy