on 10-03-2016 2:20 PM
Hi Experts,
I have a scenario where we receive demand of 1000 qty each for X part from two different customers in sales scheduling agreement and send the purchase schedule lines to one vendor for that X part. Now MRP always aggregate the qty of different customer and update my purchase schedule agreement by 2000 qty.
Now this vendor is self packed vendor which means that they pack the part and we receive in same packing and directly sends to our customer. We never unpacked that at our end.
Now Vendor is asking to send the schedule line customer wise so that they can can pack also customer wise because right now he is not able to know which customer asked how much qty.
Please anybody is having any idea how to map this? Does it need any enhancement ?
Appreciate your help in this.
Hi experts,
Any help I can have in this query? Looking forward for resolution on this please.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello
The best option to map this scenario would be to use a MTO strategy (such as 20), so that the schedule lines are linked into the sales order special stock.
Another option is to use the BAdI implementation suggested on the following document to generate separated replenishment proposals for each requirement. The problem with this solution is that you will not have a reference to the customer or sales order.
Regards.
Caetano
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello
If you are using strategy 20 and the field "individual/collective" is set to 1 on the components, MRP will generate replenishment proposals with reference to the sales order.
The problem is that, if you are using MTO, you need to have a reference to the sales order on the scheduling agreement if you want to have schedule lines generated automatically by MRP, so it may not be a very practical solution.
Regards,
Caetano
User | Count |
---|---|
90 | |
8 | |
7 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.