cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

T133C missing records

former_member994429
Discoverer
0 Kudos

Hi,

I'm working on S/4 1511.

I'm getting error while entering MM02. I'm getting error at this line:

It's caused by missing records at T133C configuration at standard screen sequence.

There should be 12 entries but there are only 7 of them.

It's print screen from mandt 020 - at 010 circled records are missing.

When i try to insert new line i'm getting error: " Insertion not possible since maximum number of subscreens reached".
There are no changes requests at any users for this objects.

After i tried to recover those entries i couldn't change anything, because all the records are deleted again. Even if i change Z* screen sequences, there were deleted.

What can i do now?

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

former_member197616
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi, If you are creating the material master try SPRO--LG--MATERIAL MASTER ---basic settings --material types area. Regards,

former_member994429
Discoverer
0 Kudos

It's problem with screens at screen sequence not with a material.

former_member197616
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi, Exactly . The path which i have provided deals with that only . Normally material type decides the views and each view will have the screen sequence Regards,

JL23
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Your second screenshot is from OMT3 transaction.

How many subscreens can be maintained is actually depending on the chosen dynpros in the folder "Data Screens" .

Press F4 in that dynpro field and you will see that there are dynpros which allow 6, 10 or even 19 Subscreens.

former_member994429
Discoverer
0 Kudos

OK, a little more detail:

there are 2 mandt at system landscape, 010 - configuration, and 020 - test.

at 010 there are configuration as follows:

As you can see screen sequence is 'DI' so it's standard SAP config. Appointed column shows a type of main screen

When i pressed F4 i got:

For example now when selected 1st entry - called 'Basic Data1', screen 07 (another standard screen).I should get 11 subscreens - 1main + 10 subscreens, but there are only 8 of them:

The best of it is that on mandt 020 there are the same config at data screen level:

And there are 4 more empty subscreens.

When i enter mm02 at mandt 020 everything is fine, end its working.

@raghavendra sai - yeah, i know that there are different screens displayed according to material typy, but as for now all materials have to display sequence screen 'DI'.

Btw. The missing records are only at this screen sequence. I'm pretty sure that its configuration problems but i can't change it any way. Even if i copy subscreens from another sequences, and i save them, something delete them again.

JL23
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

had you already checked the change history  of  this customizing in your customizing client? Did somebody remove the entries? Have there been other changes? Are those clients on a different release level?

As I am not in a DIMP solution I don't have those entries at all to cross check

former_member994429
Discoverer
0 Kudos

Juergen L wrote:

had you already checked the change history  of  this customizing in your customizing client? Have there been other changes?

There are only my transports and changes connected with this table - and there are no records with 'DI' sequence only with 'ZD' - copy of 'DI'.


Juergen L wrote:

Did somebody remove the entries?

No, it's impossible. If i click on remove line, the view set screen number to 0001, but the line is not deleted. As you mentioned before the subscreens should not be deleted, they should be set as default screen and thier number depends on 'Screen type' at Data screens' section.


Juergen L wrote:

Are those clients on a different release level?

It is the same release at both clients.

That is why it  is so strange issue to me. It looks like the standard deleted those records, but why then? And it does only at active screen. Mayby it is connected with s/4 system but i could not find any note for that.

JL23
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

As a front runner with S/4 you are also eligible to face the errors first, I would then recommend to contact SAP for an deeper analysis.