on 08-18-2016 8:29 AM
Hi Sap Experts!!
Hope you all are doing well!!
I have a doubt about adding a certain wage type with another wage type in the payslip form.
I have created a deduction wage type where the final value is multiplied with -1 it became positive it is legal company deduction must be shown in payslip with cumulation but it doesnt work for example.
as you can see above new wage type which i created got 7329,29 and loan repayment is 22,500, but i need Total company deductions should be shown as Total company deductions = 7329,29 + 22500,00 = 29829.29
Is this possible?
Thanks
Sriram
Yes this is feasible through the configuration of Cumulation ids(check the corresponding radio button using tcode Pe51).
You can create a new cumulation id here & add both wage types. You also have the flexibility of instructing the system to add or subtract each wage type in the cumulation id by entering a suitable value in the MS column. Hit F1 in this column to understand how to do this.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
1. Scrolling to the col & line of single field'
1.1 Change 'Line 1 of'' to say 'Line 20' of. The from no. can be changed;
1.2 Similarly change 'from Col no' to say 60.
Alternatively - the screen provides horizontal scroll bar; scroll horizontally left to right; this will show the col's to the right
1.3 Then press enter. This will show the lines from 20 to 55; col 60 to 132.
1.4 See if you can see the total ded amt display col & line.
1.5 . Any single fields has the desc or its text followed by a underline; If you find the single field, then press F4 key (possible entries) the underline area - any col in that underline columns.
This will show the attributes of the single field - table from where the field is obtained, conversion rule, etc.
If not found, repeat step 1.1 to 1.4 changing the 'Line m' of and 'Col n of', till you find the single field.
2. Not adding/displaying similarly for all deductions
2.1 Reason: Conversion rule for display or the adding of deduction amts not being the same
3 Deriving grand total pay or dedns:
3,1 The cum id for grand total may include
3.1.1 w/t's from RT which are not included in any cum id total (e.g., tax dedn)
3.1.2 cum id's which need to be added together.
3.2 To find which id's or individual w/t's or which eval classes are included in a cum id:
3.2.1 In the single field screen, click F4 key for the identifier field, or press icon 'consists of'; then expand all nodes;
or in cum id screen, double clicking cum id.
4. Tot dedn showing twice:
4.1 This would be due to the splits being different in RT. As suggested above by others the split needs to be removed. Or the same split removal needs to be used;
Hi Tania.
Thanks a lot for your help.. sorry for the trouble as i have never worked on payslip before!!
Under company deductions my new wage type value has appeared but it didnt add it with Loan repayment amount
again in summary column
Total company deduction appearing twice where amount 7.329,29 was not deducted from total earnings..
The payment amount seems to be taking from wage type /560, so if this is wrong, it is not a payslip issue, it is a payroll issue. Which means that you have to identify why /560 gets generated wrongly. Are you adding your wage type to /110? Check if the cumulation class 10 is selected for you wage type.
You're welcome. With regards to your query, if you check the documentation of the Dsplit field, the purpose of the field is to define which split indicators should not be taken into account. Your earlier configuration A meant that only work center/basic pay splits will not be considered. However there are various other splits which could arise from splits in other infotypes. You can verify this by checking the RT for both your wage types. You will probably see two different split indicators for each. Which is why the TCOM got generated twice, once for each split indicator.
Replacing A by * simply means that no split indicators should be considered. This is what most clients require, and I suggest you make this change for all wage types in the Window & not just these two. Unless, of course, your client in fact requires that splits should be differentiated on the payslip, which (I guess), is unlikely.
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.