on 08-09-2016 9:09 AM
Dear all,
My company is manufacturing spare parts for automobile. I have a complex scenario on one of the machine where I need advise.
one of the injection molding machine has 30 cavities in it. It is producing 30 pieces/shot. Each piece has the reference no. that tell on what cavity it is produced. our Quality department wants to record below parameters on every 3 Hrs with the reference of cavity no.
1. Weight of the Piece
2. Diameter of the piece.
3. Light of the Piece.
Sample is drawn once and then diameters of all the pieces are checked and needed to record. other than that the remaining 2 parameters it is random check out of selected 30 pieces and only 10 reads needed to incorporate against the cavity where i was produced.
I know this can be done with simple inspection plan but I am not sure about the best way to handle the case where I given them provision to enter 30 diameters with reference of each cavity in one in process inspection.
Any idea or Advise.....
Regards
CR
Hi Cristina,
You can fulfill this requirement using function In-process inspection in Production with inspection points and this requires PP-QM integration. You need to use the inspection type 03.
Check the following links for the same.
Also work with the PP consultant for configuring this.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Kumar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Kumar,
I understand we can do it with in process inspection with inspection points
My question is., for example If i am producing a shaft and i have to take 5 readings on shaft from different known places and I want to enter then in system with the reading point reference? how this can be done in inprocess inspection.
Provide one pass/fail characterisitc and have them scan their worksheet in and attach it to the inspection lot under services for object.
I know they must be using a paper based form this to record the original testing on. Why make them enter the info twice? The question is how you actually use the data values.
If you need the data for a report, then I'm not sure of any easy way around it. If you have 150 readings to enter, you have a 150 readings.
The alternative is inspection points. One operatoin with one sample for all your other testing. A sceond operation with 30 samples. Then at least these could be enterred via the spreadsheet type of data entry for inspection points which might be easier.
Craig
Craig,
Business needed it for statistical reports to monitor the deviations in product.
I am thinking what you said is bit simplier, making operation for each property which they want to record and each operation will have 30 MIC in it to cover all cavities..let me know if i misunderstood any thing.
regards
CR
You only need two operations, not one for each property. Maybe only one because I don't know what your other testing requirements are.
Operation 0010:
Sample x - test one, test two, etc..
Operation 0020:
Samples 1 through 30.
MIC 1,
MIC 2
MIC 3
etc...
Record results for operation 20 via QE71.
Craig
Craig, how 2 operations will add value, I am think off keeping something like below,
Operation 10 - Thickness
Cavi 1 thickness
Cavi 2 Thinkness
Cavi 3 thickness
Operation 20 - Length
Cavi 1 - length
Cavi 2 Length
Cavi 3 - Length
Operation 30 - Weight
cavi 1 - weight.
cavi 2 weight
cavi 3 weight ....
what do you say>?
If you are only doing the "30" cavity inspections why three operations?
I only suggested operation 0010 in my example to hold tests that you might do on the group as a whole. Like if you took one part and did a tensile strength for the batch or tested for color or something.
You can do it as you suggest above but why one operation per MIC?
With all the MIC's in one operation you can use QS71 to enter in the results in a spreadsheet form that should save a lot of time in recording once they get use to the screen. QS71 is not the greatest transaction and has some 'features' that take some getting used to. But it would be much faster to use then the standard results recording like QE51n.
Craig
User | Count |
---|---|
107 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.