GRAC_USER_ACCES_WS - Missing Simple consumer related entry

[former_member201064]

Hello experts,

while implementing the GRC-IdM scenario I have some troubles with the web service GRAC_USER_ACCES_WS. I deleted the "Simple consumer related" entry on the web service (actually not now, but some months ago when I first tried to establish the IdM GRC scenario). I tried to get it back on my own, but adding this one in SOAMANAGER isn't possible (or at least I haven't found where). I also tried to re-de the whole implementation for this webservice, but it didn't help.

Does anyone know how to get it back? Is it even relevant? Have I missed out anything while re-doing the implementation?

Details:

In the screenshot below the other web services have this entry "Simple consumer related"

I am getting an error in the IdM when I try to call the web service. As the VDS is called, I guess the problem is inside the GRC not the IdM call.

The same error occurs when I try to execute the webservice via the SoapUI program. I tried out other GRC webservices and the role search worked in both IdM and SoapUI, so it's not really a general problem but specific to the

Best regards

Dominik Trui

[former_member201064]

I found an error in the SOAMANAGER, "SOA Runtime Log/Trace Viewer":

Is this related to the "No such SSL certificate" warning in the second screenshot?

[Chenyang]

Hi Dominik,

LDAP error code 82 is a common error code and it does not give you too much information. You need to check the log in VDS to see the error details.

BTW, "No such SSL certificate" is irrelevant to your errors.

Cheers

Chenyang

[former_member201064]

Hello Chenyang,

even if I open the VDS log of that message I cannot get more information out of the error. Same in SoapUI.

What I am currently trying is to use the "real" GRC development system. The messages are related to a GRC sandbox system. My colleague said that this sandbox is not fully functional (no GRC requests possible). So I guess that could be the reason.

It will take some time until I have the implementation in the dev system finished.

Good to know that the SSL message is irrelevant, one worry less for me.

Best regards

Dominik