on 06-20-2016 6:23 PM
For Operating Expense section of the P&L, requirement is to combine account and functional area, what is the best way to do this? Is nested dimensions the only way to achieve the result, please advise.
Hi Sunny,
If you are doing planing functional area wise and you multiple functional areas then its better to create new dimension else you can do concatenation of functional are to account .
Shri
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
No I was not trying to exclude any of the FA. What I was asking was that if there is another way of designing the report to show account and functional area other than nested columns; but I'm able to achieve what I wanted based on the screen shot I sent earlier.
Thanks,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Below is a screen shot. I basically have Account on the first column and Functional Area on the second column. For operating Expense, yes specific account and Functional area combination would have to be displayed, in this case IRAD, BP, MKTG which are non admin expenses are displayed as well as the FA that makes up the admin is displayed.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Sunny,
Do you have Functional area as a dimension? If yes....then can you please share your report structure with screenshot?
In P&L for operating expenses do you have to show individual functional area wise expenses or a cumulative sum of functional areas for a particular expense?
Share report screenshot!
Regards,
JP
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.