on 06-12-2016 10:12 PM
Hi team,
We are facing the issue like,
No Authorization for personal number XXXX using the data entry profile XXX in CAT2 .
We have took the trace and applied the missing authorisations for P_ORGIN
but there are some employess are authorized fr the same data entry profile (we have only one DE profile), but when we check thre is no difference found in PA0001 for both pernrs (working and non working)
Even we have tried with * also for all the fileds (except persa in P_ORGIN), but not worked. We have checked the SAP notes which was also not useful.
But interestingly, CAT2 is working fine if we give * in persa filed of P_ORGIN.
Please let me know what could be the reason and also suggestion as we do not want to give * to that field.
Thanks,
Sankar.
It's unlikely that the authorization error message you have mentioned is due to missing PERSA authorization. How did you get the trace? Also, can you double click on the error and send a screenshot of the details.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Ask Basis Team to compare user roles one who is not facing problem, and the other who is facing problem then we can easily drill down where exactly Authorization check is getting failed then accordingly we can find a solution since it is a problem with authorization level and field.
Regards
Venkatesh
Could any please help on this issue ?
Thanks,
Aravind.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Assigne the authorization for CATS profile. using transation CAC1 and use this authorization as a subtype in authorization object P_PERNR. Infotype 316.(0316 is dummy infotype only for authorization)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Shan,
Good evening.
This is not resolved. Please help me with another suggestion.
We do not want to give * value for Persa.
Attached the authorizations and 0316 also added. Secondly, how come this is solving with PERSA field contained *.
I did not observed any difference between the employees for whom user able to do CAT2 and for other not.
Thanks,
Sankar.
User | Count |
---|---|
86 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.