Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

Meter reading assesment issue

HI Guru,

i have faced the issue during Meter assesment process,iam trying to do below senerio but it s not reestimating the reading.

This graphic is explained in the accompanying text.

V2 (100) < V1 (9990)

=> No assessing required

A reestimation would result in an overflow (high consumption).

Please let us know ,do i have to do any enhancement or work flow trigger.

Regards,

Radhika sharma.

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Assigned Tags

Related questions

3 Answers

  • Best Answer
    Posted on May 29, 2016 at 09:12 PM

    activate isu_assess workflow.

    EDIT: that is a correct validation error, the 2nd actual result is lower than the 1st & requires adjustment.

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Jun 08, 2016 at 04:46 AM

    Hi Daniel,

    Thanks for your reply,

    We have activated those settings ,but when we are doing transactions background it is automatic deactivated and not trigger what we expected.

    if we activate these settings any settings required in billing level because it is background level bill documents and invoice document will reverse for this i have to do anything billing level.

    if Meter overflow level it won't be the trigger I think.

    if i activate ISU_asses,ISU_asses1 this case how it will trigger or else we have to activate only one workflow as per requirement.

    Please give suggestions.

    Regards,

    Radhika Sharma

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Hi Radhika,

      Some things to check

      >Check if the event assessed is triggered for isucontract object

      >Put a breakpoint in fm isu_event_assessing and isu_action_assessing to check if they are executed.

      >Put a breakpoint in enhancement edmasses to check if its triggered.

      >Check that the previous meter reading(only Periodic Meter Reads) are all billed. As the workflow is based on doing adjustment reversal and doesn't work on un-billed MR results.

      Hope this helps. 😊

      Cheers,

      Rakesh..

      sapisurdg.wordpress.com

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Jul 08, 2016 at 07:20 AM

    Hi Rakesh,

    we have activated Workflow but it is not triggering and any User exit or Enhancement need to be add for above solution or else it will trigger standard.

    Regards,

    Radhika Sharma

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Hi Radhika,

      In this scenario

      You will specify actual meter reading for the first month, then you will estimate the meter readings for the next months, during estimation of meter readings, you will get the actual month reading for a particular month which may be less than the estimated meter readings of previous month.

      you have done estimation for second month.

      The last month actual meter reading must be greater than first month actual meter reading

      Now in your scenario, first month actual reading is 5750


      done estimation for consequent months ..


      then again u considered actual reading as 5740 how can be it possible ?

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.