on 05-20-2016 5:37 AM
Hi friends,
Which we are facing the one issue in process order for few materials.
They have done process orders, GI, GR , Confirmed activities and settlement has been done. Then we have identified huge variance was updated in the PO usage variance report. and identified it a problem in the BOM decimal signs , due to this it was showing the huge variance for respective materials.
Now business has been corrected in the BOM decimal sign in the bOM. Now they want correction Process order variance.or if possible manually correct the huge material usage variance without unteco the PO.
Po status: TECO CNF DLV PRC BCRQ CRFI GMPS MANC*
Hi Reddy, If I understood your issue correctly, it is not an issue with the standard cost but an issue with the decimals defined in the operational BOM (usage 1) which resulted the huge usage variance in the PO for all its components.
If it is not an issue with the standard cost (costing BOM is fine), then you need to correct the PO postings by reversing the settlement, GR (if necessary) and GI and reposting the same. May be only quantities need to be corrected here.
Ajay: correct me if I misstated anything here.
Thanks,
Srinath
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Reddy
Thats the reason I said, dont go for Reversal of Settlements and GR
You have already sold the Stock so there is no point in doing so many reversals
Explain the client why this happened, document it and close the chapter
Once you rectify the process / master data so that it does not repeat in future, it is good enough. Have you ensured that?
Ajay M
Hello
You can't do anything about it now
Just recalculate STD cost and it will take care of the future production orders
Ajay M
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Ajay,
Thanks for ur immediate response.
Can i reverse GR,GI, confirmations and settlements, after that can i delete the PO's?
possible manually correct the huge material usage variance without unteco the PO: My comment , I think its not possible manual correction in the PO.
could you please explain Just recalculate STD cost
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.