Payroll Issue

[Former Member]

Hello All

User team reported that they are failing to get additional exemption for NPS upto Rs.50000.

Please let me know if there is change in NPS pension scheme.Please advise how to implement

Reg

SK

[dsharmak · Accepted solution]

Dear SK,

Kindly check the note 2168787 is applied in the system or not ??

Also while creating a record you should create the record in It0585  "Contribtuion to pension scheme of Central Governement "

Then rerun the payroll again and check out the results.

Best Regards,
Deepak.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hello Deepak

We recently upgraded HRSP and components to HRSP98 for ECC6.0-EHP4 (up to March2016)

Note 2168787 is last year note and i am unable to find in with Sec8-0ccd IT585. Pls advise.

But have text entry as below

"Contribution to pension scheme of Central Government"  Is this NPS we talk about?

Regards

SK

[dsharmak · Accepted solution]

Dear SK,

Yes for Section 80CCD (1B), Create a contribution in this and run the payroll, you will surely get the NPS amount in form 16.

Best, Deepak.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hello Deepak

When inserted a record in IT0585 and executed payroll getting above Error under IN76 Rule

How to  fix this.

Note:- We are in HRSP98 but not used manual instructions of note 2168787 (last year)

[chetan13 · Accepted solution]

Hi SK

Can you check if the wage type /3I9 exists in view V_512W_D in your system. This should be present.

If this wage type doesn't exist, then check the same in client 000 of your system whether its present there.

This has come via old note 2168787.

Check this way.

Regards

Chetan Bajaj

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hello Chetan

I don't have /319 wage type in my  PRD system  (Don't have access to 000 and it is very tedious process).

Yes i refered the note 2168787 which is 12 Months Old and we have already updated HRSP tp latest-2, in this case all changes should have been incorporated to the system right?

or Do we need to manual changes as in the Note 2168787 even though we have latest-2 HRSP.

Pls advise.

Regards

SK

[chetan13 · Accepted solution]

Hi SK

Ideally if you are on the latest SP's , then this wage type /3I9 should be present. Not sure why its missing or something happened during any upgrades.

I would again request you to check the same in your client 000 of any of your development or test systems whether the wt is there or not.

Also you can check if other changes gone via 2168787 are present or not ? as per the manual attachment.

If only /3I9 is missing, then you need to check in client 000 and the same should be transported from there itself.

Take the help of basis people.

Regards

Chetan

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hello Chetan

Is it reasonable to ask SAP Team about the issue even though we are in Latest HRSP?

There are changes that SAP might come up with Notes or correction instruction?

Regards

SK

[chetan13 · Accepted solution]

Hi SK

But I am not sure how /3I9 is missing even though you are at latest HRSP.

Thats why I have suggested you to check as per my previous reply.

Regards

Chetan

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hello All

/3I9 is missing in PRD but available in DEV and Q Systems

When i executed Q-system I am able to get  Agg of Chapter VI  up to 2,00,000.

In this case Extra NPS exemption of 50,000 is given in the system right?

I have not activated any CC 43 or 44 for any wage type, then how come this is possible?

Regards

SK

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Can you check /3I5 technical wage type is triggerig or not...?? 

/3I5 is nothing but combination of /3I7+/3I9

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hello All

On scenario based below how below NPS exemption is calculated, pls explain me on this.

I am not getting How this Chapter VA is calculated

Pls Note:-  Total Yearly PF is 57,600.

Regards

SK

[former_member182083 · Accepted solution]

Hi Senthil,

Kindly check Wt /3F6 value, also check whether you have maintained any value in IT 585, those values also add into Chapter VI amount.

With regards,

S.Karthik