Movement type 413-Transfer from Unrestricted stock to Sales Order st (non valu)

[Former Member]

Hi Gurus

We use non valuated sales order scenario for doing Advance Unit Replacement scenario.

In Advance Unit Replacement scenario, we receive the customer stock through movement type (MT) 653 E and keep it as non valuated sales order stock .

In  Advance Unit Replacement scenario as a condition with the customer,  we have to first send replacement and that stock could be NEW or Refurbished.

When we deliver the stock to the customer (replacement mentioned above) we use movement type 601 E. At that time I got the error no sales order stock exist.

So I used MB11 and assign MT 413 and (not E) through I tried to transfer one pc from unrestricted stock to Sales Order stock E.

When I was to save I got the error " KI 235 consumption entry requires a cost object"

I temporarily assigned a cost center to the consumption account and then tried to post for 100$

Dr. 510000 -Mat cons     100$ with cost center:  X001 and Sales Order number 400001 and SO line item 10000

Cr. Inventory  100$

I saw in the consumption GL account both cost center and sales order number were shown as cost object.

I displayed the sales order line item through VA03 I could display the debit amount of 100$

Why cost center and sales order is shown cost object and I think cost center is the real object and sales order is statistical object,

I tried to settle the sales order with RA key ( T code KKA3 I could calculate and through VA88 I settled Sales Order to COPA)

Dr. PSG Cr. SO for 100$

Questions:

Why cost center is debited when I transferred to Sales Order Stock from unrestricted stock

When I could move the costs from Sales Order to COPA, system behaved Sales Order is the true object by crediting SO and Debiting

COPA.

What is the fate of debit in the Cost Center

I expect to issue consumption directly to Sales Order (True Account Assignment)  and not to Cost Center which is not needed.

Please help urgently and we are in UAT

Regards

Revathi

[Former Member]

Ajay

Any response to the screen I sent you.

Revathi

[Former Member]

Ajay

The screen shot was an error.

I found 412 E when I issue material to a sales order after changing storage location, system accepted the consumption with sales order cost object and inventory as credit and outbound delivery from RAS order type through movement type 601 E without accounting entry.

I think this is OK and this is my solution I will be following.

Thanks for your input.

I mark your response as helpful and close the thread now

Revathi

[ajaycwa1981]

Hi Revati

Is your sales order a cost object? (account assignment category E)

what's the valuation indicator in Req. Class?

I think the refurbished item has a price but not a sales order stock price. Try maintain MR21 for the material and sales order and then do the 413. It should not hit any prd during transfer

Ajay M

[Former Member]

Ajay

Thanks for your quick response.

The material is FERT, Price control is S and this has got a standard cost estimate.

This is a new , regular material which is produced and kept in stock.

As part of extended warranty, if there is a defect in the product which is sold originally, supposed to be replaced by a new or refurbished part.

In our scenario we have a new part which has standard cost as mentioned above.

Now When I tried to use MT 413,

Dr. Cons with cost center and also Sales Order

Cr. Stock

So I could see 2 lines 1st line being cost center, 2nd line being Sales Order.

I could imagine SO is Statistical cost obj and Cost Center real object, but why?

I am moving it from unrestricted to Sales Order stock.

So Sales Order should only be cost object? What is the logic?

Why KI 235 error and because of which only I assigned the cost center in OKB9 for example, just to proceed with the transactions. This is not the right behavior.

So first step I moved the stock from unrestricted to sales order which I could see through t code MB51

Then I did an outbound delivery through VL01N against the sales Order,  at that time system did not create an accounting document but only delivered the quantity, so accounting document created.

Answering your question, yes the consumption indicator is E and it maintained as a special stock E and NOT treated as a valuated sales Oder.

In RC configuration the account assignment category is E and Valuation is Blank, as I said, we intentionally do not want to use Valuated Sales Order method for this scenario.

Finally I ran the settlement of sales , first step to calculate RA and then VA88 where the

Dr. P S G Cr. SO.

If the SO was the Statistical object then how was it possible to PSG?  After settlement SO balance was zero which I could display through VA03 and cost report

So what will happen to the line item debit against Cost Center.??????...

Revathi.

[ajaycwa1981]

Hi Revati

Your OBD did not create an Accounting Doc. This means the Sales Order price of this material was zero

Can you maintain MR21 for the material and sales order and then try 413

Ajay M

[Former Member]

Ajay

There is a cost estimate price for the material. The first part is answered.

As I said this is Non Valuated Sales Order Method.

Valuated Sales Order Method Valuation field in t code OVZG M is assigned. I left that field blank.

Now do you mean price at the sales order condition to have a price and if yes which condition type to have a price. Is VPRS ? I am not sure if we have VPRS in our pricing procedure even

if is maintained then how systems will valuate the line item of material in outbound delivery

with that price since the condition type statistical and more over normally you assign a VF in

COPA for capturing the cost .

Not sure this will work?

Revathi

[ajaycwa1981]

Hi

you are complicating it

I just asked you to maintain same price in MR21 for the refurb. material + sales order combination and then do 413

[ajaycwa1981]

Hi

you are complicating it

I just asked you to maintain same price in MR21 for the refurb. material + sales order combination and then do 413

[ajaycwa1981]

Hi

you are complicating it

I just asked you to maintain same price in MR21 for the refurb. material + sales order combination and then do 413

[ajaycwa1981]

Hi

you are complicating it

I just asked you to maintain same price in MR21 for the refurb. material + sales order combination and then do 413

[Former Member]

Ajay

Probably I did not understand what you meant.

There is a price in the material through standard cost estimate already. So there is no do any MR21 for the material which I received from the customer.

Help me my understanding is correct?

I am not clear  'MR21 for the refurb. material + sales order combination'

Request you to be little more specific.

There is a price in the material master for the material which I explained above.

Sales Order level price, do you mean to enter a price in the sales order through a condition type

or do you mean condition record ????

Revathi

[Former Member]

Ajay

I understood what you meant by trying in MR21. But the issue was we 'non valuated sales order method only' and not valuated order method. The method is applicable to valuated SO only it seems.

I agree I never tried this combination of Material, SO order, item,

Is it possible to achieve this in Non Valuated Sales Order...?

Please let me know your feedback

Thanks

Revathi

[ajaycwa1981]

Hello

Is it an error or warning?

Can you not do mb1a and issue the material into sales order, the way we issue to a cost center?

if not, create a production order, consume the component there and settle the production order to sales order/ service order