cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Data Missmatch issue

former_member229127
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Experts ,

Their is an typical issue for my interface in the which , i have re design the interface in the which i have added only 2 fields in the middle of the structure .

My issue is that in the file,,  data is replicating at the end ??

can any one help me out please .

Regards,

Sandhya

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

former_member186851
Active Contributor
0 Kudos


Hello Sandhya,

Make sure all the objects are activated and cache is up to date.

former_member229127
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Raghu ,

All the objects and cache is up to date

Answers (5)

Answers (5)

vijender_p
Active Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Sandhya ,

You edit and save for communication channel ,confgrtn and activate once again .

Regards,

former_member229127
Participant
0 Kudos

I have checked the payload mapping and also it is reflecting the same issue .

can any one help me out please .

Regards,

manoj_khavatkopp
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Then I guess you need to change in mapping level itself.. It would be helpful if u put screeshot of you mapping as well as expected payload

former_member229127
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi all,

As per it is a simple IDOC to File scenario , but am but am not getting were am failing in these ,

my target structure is as follows

And the latest 2 fields i have added in the structure is only the Commission _target and Bonus_Frame Work ,

For these i have used module configuration for obtaining file name

So whether , to maintain in an order of the file whether i have to add any more content conversion ??

As the Header line is correct but , data is miss matching means to say that it is not replicating the data of that header .

As per the above file the data of commission Target and Bonus _frame Work should be 9ARR and 10 but is replicating for the other Field ie CSW and Job Field ...

Help me out in sorting out this issue ...

Best regards,

Sandhya

manoj_khavatkopp
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Did you try Praveen's solution of using map with default it should work. If you still see mismatch I would suggest you to check in mapping,  check whether you are getting expected value in expected field after message mapping execution.

former_member229127
Participant
0 Kudos

yes i have used map with default value already

former_member186851
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

check the paylod in mapping .

iaki_vila
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Sanhya,

Are you using an ABAP proxy?, if you add or delete fields the ABAP system can't serialize/deserialize the data in the ABAP classes because the system finds tags that it can't know how to deal with them.

As Manoj said, when you share more characteristics about your scenario the SCN members could help you better and with more specific answers.

Regards.

manoj_khavatkopp
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

Can you please let us know your receiver adapter ?

Can you see the new fields after mapping execution?

If it is File/SFTP and if Content version is used make sure you include these fields in FCC too.

If it is proxy then ABAP'er has to regenerate the proxy again.

Br,

Manoj

former_member229127
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Manoj ,

We are using File adapter for this ..

And i can see the new field in in the file , as all the header is same but the data is miss matchs ,

like wise column is miss matching .

Regards,

iaki_vila
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Sandhya,

Are you using file content conversion?, if you are using it you should deal with these filed changed on the FCC tab as well.

Regards.

manigram
Active Participant
0 Kudos

HI,

if there is FCC , so check is it configured properly ?

REgards,

Manigandan

manoj_khavatkopp
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

"And i can see the new field in in the file , as all the header is same but the data is miss matchs , like wise column is miss matching ."

So do you mean that you can see the new fields in File header but not the respective data then we would suggest you to check in mapping if the respective field data is generating or not ? Please if possible try to put screenshot of your FCC and also the payload after mapping.

former_member182412
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Sandhya,

Add MapWithDefault to all the fields in the mapping then you dont get mismatch if the field does not exist in the source.

Regards,

Praveen.