INCI codes and CAS-numbers in EH&S

[Former Member]

Hello,

This is probably very basic question.

I'd like to know how to implement the following requirement:

I have a material XXX, three INCI codes A, B, and C. In addition, there are three CAS-numbers.

I want to create a kind of a BOM in EH&S for my material with the INCI codes:

Material XXX consists of:

INCI A 20 % (and CAS number A1 20%)

INCI B 70 % (and CAS number B1 70%)

INCI C 10 % (and CAS number B1 10%).

I'm not familiar with EH&S but I carried out some testing and found out that I can link the material with the "real substance"? I think I need to create one substance for each INCI code which makes a bit annoying. The point is that when you insert your "BOM" for the new material you can easily pick up the existing INCIs - not having to write them all over again.

I couldn't find anywhere place for the percentages! We need them for calculations elsewhere. I read SAP documentation but couldn't find anything there either.

Thanks for the help.

Regards,

Pipsa

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Pipsa,

If you want to do it manually:

According to the standard EH&S data model you should create new specifications in transaction CG02 with specification type PURE_SUB. The CAS number you should enter on the identifier tab page (NUM/CAS). You should also enter the INCI code on this tab, but I am not sure if the INCI code is part of the EH&S standard identifier, so maybe you have to customize it.

For your material XXX you should create a REAL_SUB (for real existing substances in the material master). Create some unseful identifier (like NAM/MAT for material name) and assign the material number on the material assignment tab.

Now jump to the property tree and look for the right composition (for example Standard Composition) to mantain your BOM (which is called BOS - Bill of Substances - in EH&S).

Enter the 3 PURE_SUBs that you created before with the percentages.

Hope it helps,

Andreas

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hello Andreas,

Thanks for the quick answer. There is one problem. I'm in the correct transaction, but I simply cannot find the way how to create the specification you mentioned and the spec. type PURE_SUB.

I'm in the CG02 and immediately saw the REAL_SUB after clicking "Create" in the Edit substance: Initial screen. I haven't configured anything in EH&S. The system is standard 4.6C. Should I add this PURE_SUB also?

Regards,

Pipsa

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

yes, TA CG02, press the create button, and enter spec type PURE_SUB (you should find it in the value help) and an AuthGroup (ALL for example).

Hit Enter and Save and the spec is created.

If you go back you should see the newly created spec on the hitlist.

Maybe this helps also:

<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/a7/286e5f0a6c11d28a220000e829fbbd/frameset.htm">http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/a7/286e5f0a6c11d28a220000e829fbbd/frameset.htm</a>

Regards,

Andreas

[Former Member]

Dear Andreas,

I am doing config for manual report shipping ( for fax). the report shipping order status does not change from bundling to generation in CVD1. pl. guide me what could be the issue.

rgs

swami

-

---

[Former Member]

Hello,

When talk about spec. field you mean Substance category field (RCGRHSCR-SUBCAT)? All I can find there is listed below (and with auth. group. ALL):

DG_CL_SUB Dangerous goods classification

LIST_GRP Listed substance group

LIST_SUB Listed substance

LS_UN_SUB UN listed substance

REAL_GRP Real substance group

REAL_SUB Real substance

TEMPLATE Template

I checked the IMG and there is no such thing as Specification in 4.6C but it does exist in 4.7 already. What version do you work with? I saw the specification, no PURE_SUB though, in 4.7 but unfortunately I cannot use it here. Thanks for the Help URLs I have checked them. I'll try to sort this out.

Pipsa

[Former Member]

Hi,

PURE_SUB should be EH&S standard (independent on the release) as far as I know, but if it is not there, don't worry, just take a LIST_SUB, doesn't make much difference.

It's more a question how you organize your data model, not a technical problem.

Regards,

Andreas

[Former Member]

Hi,

Thanks a lot for your help. I'll try to sort this mess out. Now the system is whining about the batch definition (field TCUCH-KZDCH != 0) Because I know the material plant combination is correct. I'll ask my colleague about it. I'll try the other system also, because it has the specification unlike this 4.6C.

Regards,

Pipsa