Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

Phase ACT_UPG

Hello,

We have a problem with phase ACT_UPG. I attached screenshot with the error and log ACTUPG.ELLG

Please letme Known  your comments .

Regards

ACTUPG.txt.zip (577 B)
problem.png (19.3 kB)
Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

3 Answers

  • Best Answer
    avatar image
    Former Member
    Nov 04, 2015 at 01:36 PM

    Hi,

    With regards to the activation error in ACT_UPG phase, can you please check the following documents:

    2050604 - Problem analysis in upgrade: Phase ACT_UPG

    How to analyse the Activation Phase (ACT_UPG) during a SUM upgrade

    Thank you.

    Regards,

    Maha

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Nov 04, 2015 at 01:40 PM

    Hello Jorge,

    The reply is probably too late.

    You need to logon to the Shadow Instance and see what is causing activation errors for the objects listed in the ELG file.

    The PROBAU seem to be in the customer namespace. I'd certainly want to make sure KNA1 is activating correctly as this is the customer master table.

    Did the same objects appear in your SPDD list ?

    KR,

    Amerjit

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Nov 04, 2015 at 08:49 PM

    Hello,

    we find objects (domains) that are only in source system, but it not in the shadow. But i dont know how to solve this problem.

    I would appreciate comment about this issue.

    Regards.

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Hello Jorge,

      1. As a starting point, open a message with SAP.

      2. As I asked before, did the impacted objects appear in your SPDD list ?

      3. Please check your logs for the missing objects/domains to see if they were deleted during the transition to the Shadow Instance. I've had this happen to me before.

      4. Are the deleted objects delivered by SAP or by a addon from a partner or from within your own namespace ?

      5. Is the owner of the missing objects SAP ?

      If you could post an example it really would help.

      Coming back to KNA1 as at least it's a standard delivery, has the table been extended with a append structure  and what is the activation error ?

      You see, many questions need to be answered before you can hope for meaningful replies from the community.

      KR,

      Amerjit