Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

ERS for Service PO

Hello,

I had a question regarding ERS for service. In case of Material PO for ERS, When a Goods receipt is created, we could use GR/GI slip no field (XBLNR) to have a unique identification name, which would also get automatically populated on invoice when MRRL converts it shown below. This would hence help our vendor identify for which material we are paying the invoice. (FYI-we do not have a MM number, its only short text)

Invoice created with Reference field as text from GR/GI slip "SAC1234" as shown below

Similarly is it possible to have a similar identification field for service PO/ service entry sheet.?

In case of service entry sheet the REFERNCE field will get only populated on GR but not on invoice, so vendor do not have a unique identification to determine for which service is this payment for.

Reference from Service entry would be populated as Delivery note on GR as shown below and GR/GI slip would be blank

Invoice do not have any reference from the GR or Service entry as shown below, so vendor can not identify them

Is it possible to have a reference from service entry sheet to invoice ?

1.png (61.4 kB)
2.png (65.0 kB)
3.png (45.3 kB)
4.png (54.0 kB)
5.png (60.6 kB)
Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Related questions

1 Answer

  • Posted on Oct 30, 2015 at 02:56 AM

    Hi ,

    Yes its possible to have the Service entry sheet reference same in the MRRL but you have to do small enchantment or BDC you can do , we had same case with client we have done BDC it will work fine

    Thanks

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • I know this is from 2015, but by chance do you have any additional specifics for the enhancement that you made? I'm running into the exact same problem.

      Did you create a Z version of the MRRL Tcode? Did you populate the GR document and also the Invoice? Or just by populating the GR document, the invoice got automatically populated?

      Any additional feedback would be great !

      Thanks!