on 10-28-2015 12:42 PM
Hi All
I have one requirement in my project where I want to replicate the data to 3 different systems.
Let suppose I have 50 attributes including standard and custom assigned under different entities in MDG and now I want to replicate lets say 15 fields (standard + custom) to one system, 15 fields to 2nd system and rest in 3rd system in the same change request.
Is it possible and if yes, please let me know the procedure.
Thanks for the reply Kiran, Sudhir
For example if I have a custom data model Product Info and I want to replicate from MDG to ECC system and Legacy systems.
I have General data, Basic Data, Classification, Supplier information, etc.
Out of this I want to send Classification data in the legacy system, Supplier info to ECC system and so on.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Abhishek,
If you want to distribute different segment of IDoc to different system like 'A' Segment to System A but not 'B' Segment to System A and vice versa. Then You can create these filter in 'BD56' TC and achieve bove requirement but it works on whole segment level not on field level.
Second Scenario will be like say if you want to send only '0001' company code or any specific sales area to any specific system then you can create these filter in BD64 TC but again these will work based on key fields of entity.
Thank you..
Regards,
Sudhir Wakodikar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi
This is an unusual case. Normally we move the entire data to Sys A / B and C or may be depending upon the primary key parameters like Chart of account as an example.
When you create a CR Type, you can specify the target system and then with SMT mapping you can move the data to that particular system.
Can you give me one example where the data is different in 3 systems? If yes then I would suggest you to create a separate entity type for data which will become easier for you to control. You can easily manage the access through authorization.
BRF will be very difficult if you go by field level and it will be more confusing.
Can you give me one example where these fields are different in each system?
Hope you understand my point...
Kiran
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
89 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
9 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.