Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

Entry is not allowed (due to K **** and P****)

Hi All,

I am trying to change the cost center relationship of an urg unit through PO10 HRP1001A011 K, getting an error as mentioned in the subject line, please guide me to resolve this.

I have checked cost center company code and P company code and both are same, i need to make changes in the Org Unit level

Regards,

Boopathi

Capture.JPG (11.6 kB)
Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

2 Answers

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Oct 20, 2015 at 11:39 AM

    We can maintain cost center either at Organization unit level or Position level.

    Check allowed relationships between O and K objects in the IMG.

    Enter Organizational unit number with validity periods then select Relationships accordingly maintain relationship between K and O.

    Before that check how exactly cost centers can be maintained i.e we can default cost center or we can maintain manually.

    Regards

    Venkatesh

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Oct 21, 2015 at 12:41 PM

    Direct creating  relationship in PD between CC (type K) and person (P) is not the standard way.

    In PA30, you can create IT 27 for certain periods.

    Or when a person is assigned short term assignments to another position, a CC is entered for the period, normally by the fact that the CC is associated to the different position.

    Even the primary CC shown in IT 1 is brought in from PD data to be displayed, when the maintenance module invokes a function to validate the position assigned; it is not entered by user during this transaction.

    Only sometimes you may find errors in the relationships in PD.  This happens due to transactions not completing successfully.

    For example, when a person is re-assigned to another position, the relationship between the old position and the person should be delimited. Sometimes you find the person has relationships to both position (not as concurrent employment).  In this case, manual delimitation would be used.

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded