on 10-12-2015 4:26 PM
We are facing problems in splitting a payment document from APP F110 for bill of exchange payment method. the invoice is normal splitted to segments but the problem is that not all the lines in the payment document is not splitted and the system gives error. below are screenshots for the invoice and the payment and the journal entry from the payment in case we made the segment not mandatory field. which is not required by the Customer.
Hi,
are you using FAGL_DERIVE_SEGMENT BADI?
The segment cannot be derived by document splitting either, because you
filled the profit center in the entry view via FAGL3KEH even though
both the profit center and the segment have been specified as document
splitting characteristics. Therefore error GLT2 201 referring to the
missing segment is justified.
Generally in items to be edited by document splitting none of the
document splitting characteristics should be filled in the entry view,
whereas in items not to be edited by document splitting all the
document splitting characteristics should be filled in the entry view.
Consequence: if your customizing filling the profit center (via FAGL3KJEH),
but not the segment in the entry view of the bank item, is
inappropriate.
There are the following options to fill the segment in the bank item:
1) Enhance your implementation of BAdI FAGL_DERIVE_SEGMENT so that
it will write a segnment to the bank item even though the cost center
is initial.
2) Assign a segment to the master data of the profit center used in
FAGL3KEH. Then the segment from profit center master data will be
written to the bank item together with the profit center.
3) Remove the entry for the bank account in FAGL3KEH. Instead of using
a default profit center customize document splitting appropriately so
that both the profit center and the segment of the bank item will be
derived from the vendor item by document splitting.
The common way to fill profit center and segment in payment documents
is option 3.
Please see also note 686531 for general informations on the derivation
of the segment in General Ledger.
Hope this be helpful for you.
Cristiano
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thank you Cristiano for your Reply. What we need is option 3 to customize document splitting appropriately so that both the profit center and the segment of the bank item will be derived from the vendor item by document splitting. Could you please help with the correct customizing for this point as I’m facing error also in posting for F-36 Bill of Exchange?
Hi,
note below may help you:
1085921 - Document split
In Configuration go to
IMG -->Financial Accounting(New) -->General Ledger Accounting(New) -->Business Transactions -->Document Splitting -->Edit Constants for Nonassigned Processes.
Here we will assign Business Area/Profit Center/Segment depending on the Splitting done.
Assign Default Segment for the Controlling Area.
Maintaining default Segment will not do any postings on Default Segment assigned while doing Transactions.
Hope this helps you.
Regards,
Cristiano
Hi,
Cristiano is right, please follow his advice and the issue should be resolved. If not please let us know with details.
Regards
MG
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Mazen,
I had a similar situation sometime ago and I had to create a new Business Transaction Variant (0000 - Z002 ) which derives information from the Vendor (in your case Customer).
When you simulate the document in NewGl, check out for the item Category (2000 in your case) and see if you can derive it correctly.
SPRO: FInancial accounting (New) -> General Ledger Accounting (New) -> Business Transactions -> Document Spliting -> ...
...-> Classify Gl Accounts for document splitting
...-> Clasify Document Types for splitting
...-> Extended Document splitting -> Define document splitting rule
...-> Extended Document splitting -> Define business transaction variant
Here is my splitting rule, replace vendor with customer
Kind Regards
User | Count |
---|---|
90 | |
8 | |
7 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.