FMJ0 & FMJ2

[former_member7439]

Hello,

In the year end process, I am unable to understand the difference between FMJ0 & FMJ2 and when the same have to be used.

Regards

[iklovski]

Hi,

FMJ2 is a normal carry-forward for open documents. FMJ0 is treating documents, where open amount is equal to zero. Sometimes, it's essential to carry-forward some of those documents due to internal settings defined for specific client's needs. For example, you use pre-commitments and commitments and commitments are adapting the address from pre-commitment. In this case, if you have fully consumed pre-commitment and carry-forward only open commitment, this might create an issue if FM assignment is changed with year-end exercise. Hence, you are obliged to carry-forward also the pre-commitment even if it's fully consumed.

Regards,

Eli

[former_member7439]

Hello

In the case then should FMJ0 & FMJ2 be always be part of our year end closing process.

[iklovski]

FMJ2 - yes (though, even this under most common practice), FMJ0 - potentially.

[former_member7439]

Hello,

But in case of FMJ2, what we have observed is that after a PO is trasnferred, quite a few times when we again run FMJ2, it is again available for transfer.

What could be reason for the PO getting available for transfer in FMJ2

[iklovski]

It's impossible. Then, you have a problem in your settings/data.

[former_member7439]

Not all PO are so available.But there are some POs which are so available.

What probably could be the reason?or where shud i have a look.

[iklovski]

You should analyse your FMIOI data after the carry-forward for 'problematic' POs.

[former_member7439]

Hello,

Is there any config setting for FMJ2 for POs which influence the carry forward.

[iklovski]

In what sense? Please, be specific...