Hi AIF Community,
we identified following behavior in the AIF structure mapping processing:
The order in processing the structure mapping is the same as displayed in the structure mapping customizing. It is the alphabetic order of the source structures. In case you cannot control the naming of the source structures you cannot control the order of the structure mapping processing. In a field mapping you need to use a target value from another structure (e.g. company code in a header structure) that is processed afterwards we need to implement function modules extra for this field mapping. The simple existing AIF value mappings cannot be used in this case.
Does someone had also the same problems and used another better solution?
Is there any possibility to control the order of the structure mappings besides the naming of the source structures?