on 08-19-2015 10:20 AM
Hi All.
I found some information in community related to my issue but i want to know the reason in my issue, let me explain my scenario , As i did UD(QA11) and i forgot to post the stock, just i did UD (QA11), then how the system still show the qty under Quality Inspection.
Best Regards
Bhagee
Hello Bhagee, it is designed in that way only. Basically stock posting and UD are 2 separate events and have no link unless you put some status profile, any custom exit or stock posting proposals through QS51. You can search such lots using tcode QVM2 or in QA32 itself also. Locate the lots with SPST or SPRQ status and complete the stock posting.
If you want to put the lock in system that UD should not be done unless stock posting is done that is also possible. Explore more in SCN. Many threads are available to establish this.
Anand
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Anand Rao,
Thank you for your information. But i want to know exactly what happening when UD done and if we are not doing stock posting , As you are telling UD and stock posting are two events but i did only one event that is UD then how stock posting completed done and status get updated as stock posting completed please explain as i am new to QM world.
Best Regards
Bhagee
Ok! I make it simpler!
So, you just want to understand this or your problem is - after the SPCO status update still the stock is in QI? if so I suggest to check below,
Anand
Hi Anand Rao,
i want to understand why the stock is still under quality inspection even after completion of UD and material document created with movement type 321.
I am referring to the correct inspection lot only.
As per your request i checked the note but it is not showing .please check the note and give me the correct note.
Best regards
Bhagee
Hey I'm sorry. It was typo. My bad . The correct note number is 48815. Here is the similar thread!
http://scn.sap.com/thread/437182
In your case if you are referring to the correct inspection lot then this would surely be stock inconsistency issue. The above note would solve your problem. If not then I suggest to raise this to SAP.
Anand
User | Count |
---|---|
103 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.