on 06-24-2015 8:58 AM
Hi all ,
I have a payroll (UK payroll)issue wherein when employee has a wage type 2010 on IT0008 and is absent for the entire month , payroll calculation doubles the amount of wage type 2010 when paying the employee.
upon deleting the absence record from IT 2001 the calculation is correct
The underlining condition is that wage type 2010 (infotype 0008) is added up twice in the valuation basis in PCR Z010 & Z072
So /010 is inflated by the value of 2010 and so the EE is overpaid as the value of /010 is overstated
Can any one please suggest as this double payment from IT0008 is driven due to active absence record during payroll run.
Thanks
Gauri
Message was edited by: Sikindar A
Can you let us know the Value of Processing Call 10 of this wage type ?
Check the the input and out put of this wage type in Factoring PCR , it comes due to maintaining of 0 in PRCL 10
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Deactaviting Z010 will be an option , But we should check other issues which will get effected
and valid date from which this wage type should not be part of Z010
If you are good in writing Schemas , Change Z072 with specification 4 (custome specification which will do same as 2 and assign that to wage type 2010 in V_512W_D ) with date Specification
HI pallavi,
Please check the valuation basis PCR Z010.Here due to some incorrect operation place may causing the doubling of NUM.Which finally multiplies with the WT 2010 from IT0008 and hence the resultant amount is double.
Regards
Suman
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
If you have found that it's happening due to these PCR then check the PCR processing at the payroll run and evaluate that how this wage type are passing through these two pcr's.
Regards,
Sankarsan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
91 | |
11 | |
10 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.