on 06-20-2015 5:29 AM
Dear SAP Experts,
I have the following requirement and would like to get your advice if there is any better way to set the configuration , instead of manual update in the remaining useful life.
Acquisition cost @July 2014 : $12,000
Depreciation start date : Jul 2014
Useful life : 10 years (120months)
Depreciation cost : $100/month
Net Book Value @Nov 2015 = Acquisition cost - depreciation cost for 17months (Jul 14 to Nov 15) = $10,300
Additional cost @Dec 2015 : $6,000 (Y) --> different year from acquisition year
Revised Cost : NBV @Nov 2015 + Additional cost (Y) = $16,300
Revised Depreciation : Revised cost / (120months - (17months + 1month) = $159.80
The current configuration as below.
Base method : 0011 (ordinary percentage from useful life)
Multilevel method : per 1, base value 24 , rem.llife active
Smoothing : active
To calculate the revised depreciation with additional 1 month, I have tried to change the remaining useful life in asset master data
from 17 months to 18 months.
My question : Is there any other better solution, instead of updating the remaining useful life manually ?
Appreciation your input and advice.
Thank you.
Lynn
Hi Lynn,
You can also increase the useful life of the asset.
Regards,
Mukthar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Mukthar,
Actually, the useful life has been maintained in OAYZ.
The question I refer to is more on how the system could change the expired useful life/remaining useful life (with additional month), instead of manual change.
When the cost adjustment is posted on Dec, the system will need to adjust the expired useful life with additional 1 month (from 17 months to 18months), so remaining useful life (120months-18months).
By default, system will base on the expired useful life as 17 months, instead of 18months.
Thank you.
Lynn.
Hi,
You cannot directly change the remaining life, because the field is not available to change even you set the field status as optional. Instead you have to change the useful life of the asset, then system will automatically adjust the remaining life. Yes, it is a common practice to change the life.
Regards,
Mukthar
Hi Mukthar,
Sorry, I meant the expired useful life.
If the Useful life : 10 years (120months), I would need to add 1 month to the expired useful life (17months --> changed to 18months) if the system could not have the logic to automate the addition 1 month to the expired useful life.
So, what is the benefit / consideration if we change the expired useful life , instead of useful life?
Which one is the common practice ?
Regards,
Lynn
User | Count |
---|---|
98 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.