Assigned Value mismatch after settlement in CJ33

[nabeel_bhatty]

Dear All,

We are using PS module, and the issue we are facing is that after execution of settlement from WBS element to AUC the assigned value is doubled (in t-code CJ33). Which leads to more budget being consumed than the original consumption.

The Release Amount in CJ33 is Rs 1,164,515.96 however the Assigned value is Rs 905,322.46 which is exactly twice of consumption values. The Original cost on WBS Element is Rs 452,661.23. Assigned value is doubled after the execution of Settlement of cost from WBS element to AUC. Why is the system making the assigned value Double?

What could be the possible reason for this, as this was not happening previously and has started happening in a few cases.

Regards,

Nabeel Bhatty

[Paulo_Vitoriano]

Have a look into Availability control analysis for line items that you should be able to access from the menu, for every line item you will see the relevance for the assigned value. Described situation can happen if your BS account for AuC is created as cost element and not excluded from availability control.

[Former Member]

UP please!