cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

VPRS in third party flow

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Expert:

ABout the Third party flow, i met a problem recently.

in the PO, it has material cost 100, and freight cost 10.

in the sales billing , the VPRS also equals 110 .

but after MIRO

the VPRS in sales billing has changed to 100 (110-10).

Does anyone has idea that can let the VPRS do not change after MIRO?

thanks,

Linda

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

miya_wang
Active Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Linda,

The behavior you described is the standard behavior SAP system.

In the case of a billing document for a third-party order, planned delivery costs (freight) are not transferred to the cost of the customer billing document.

SAP Developerhas confirmed that for compatibility reasons, the response in the standard system cannot be changed.

If you want to change this behavior, you can use user exit EXIT_SAPLV45P_002 (LV45PF0M program) to implement a modification.

Best regards, Miya

former_member207505
Contributor
0 Kudos

Hello Linda,

  As of Release 4.6, the costs for a third-party business transaction

are only transferred from the billing document to the costing-based

profitability analysis via condition type VPRS. Please read note 322497

regarding system behavior in third-party case.

  Individual purchase orders should be handled in the same way as third-

party billing documents regarding the determination of condition type

'VPRS'. The VPRS condition will contain the right value.

  If we pass the costs also during the invoice receipt then you will

have duplicate costs i.e. once during IR and again during billing.

  If you wish to bypass the standard behavior then you can activate the

exit in note 1376862. However this is not recommended.

You can use the user-exit solution described in the attached note

1376862. The code is already part of your system so that the only step

necessary is to implement and activate the RKE_EXIT as described in the

note.

Note 1376862 is a pilot release note. so i think maybe it will be better that you can

create one incident for the issue.

Thanks and best regards,

Ronghua Fan