P2P State versus Installment Plan State

Hello Collections Experts,

Can someone explain the difference between the 'state of a Promise to Pay versus the state of an Installment Plan please? We cretaed a P2P as an installment plan. When we did this the state under tab 'Promise to Pay' column 'State of Promise To Pay' was recorded as 'Open'. If we click on Installment Plan the column 'State of Installment' was recorded as 'Open'. In table FDM_P2P_ATTR the state was recorded as 0 (Open) and in table UDM_P2P_ATTR the state was recorded as 0 (Open).

Later when the P2P was overdue, the state under tab 'Promise to Pay' column 'State of Promise To Pay' is showing as 'Installment is Overdue'. While under the Installment Plan itself the column 'State of Installment' is showing as 'Not Paid On Schedule'. In table FDM_P2P_ATTR and table UDM_P2P_ATTR the state is recorded as 6 (Partially Kept Not On Schedule).

See attached.

We don't know why tab 'Promise to Pay' column 'State of Promise To Pay' is showing as 'Installment is Overdue' while the Installment Plan column 'State of Installment' is showing as 'Not Paid On Schedule'.

Are there different states for a P2P versus Installment plan and can anyone advise what DB tables these 2 seemingly different states are recorded/stored in?

Thanks and regards

Michael