on 03-05-2015 11:25 AM
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You have excise in your conditions which is 160387.06 per 9000
now you do a partial receipt of 3500, hence this excise is proportioned to the receipt,
calculation: 160387.06 mult 3500 div 9000 = 62372.7455555556
since the value field allows only 2 decimals, this value of 62372.7455555556 is rounded to 62372,75
so the final total is: 427000 plus 62372.75 = 489372.75
And the invoice from your supplier is 489372.74
Hence you have 0.01 difference.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
If your vendor invoice shows 489372.74 then you have to enter this amount in the amount field, as it is the amount which your vendor expects to get paid from you.
There is no calculation that will alter this amount
If you want overpay this 0.01 to your vendor to avoid that it posts as difference, then you can do it if your management gives you the permission to enter other amounts than the invoice shows.
Dear Jurgen,
Thank you for your support. But here can you tell me one thing, why in MIRO system do not pick value as 489372.75??? In MIRO why system is not rounding just like MIGO?
How to avoid 0.01 INR difference in such rounding effect scenario?
Thanks & Regards,
Biraj Adeshara
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Hope this entry because of rounding profile activated for this. Because of this 0.59 it is took like 0.60 ...but actually is 0.59 ... so 0.01 is posted to difference (Rounding off).
check rounding off activated or not from FI side.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I would say it is just caused by a rounding effect since the bottom up calculation (from item) does not equal with the entered value in the MIRO header.
If you would post your PO condition screen and tell what you entered in MIRO, then it would be possible to show you the calculation
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear All,
for above material code, Price control is S. But in one more test case where Price control is V and hitting 0.01 INR in BSX account key. Can anybody tell me the reason?
Let me brief you here my entries. P.O. quantity is 9000. First time MIGO quantity is 3500 and MIRO is posted for the same. Here system is hitting 0.01 INR in BSX account key.
Now, I am doing MIGO for remaining 5500 quantity and MIRO for the same quantity then system is not hitting 0.01 INR. so why system is behaving different for remaining full quantity. Why for second entries with full quantity, system is not posting in 0.01 INR? Please find the screenshot for first MIGO and MIRO and second MIGO and MIRO.
MIGO entry with 3500 Quantity:
MIRO entry with 3500 Quantity:
MIGO with remaining 5500 Quantity:
MIRO with remaining 5500 Quantity:
This issues are coming live server so above test case I have created in Quality server.
Also I have observed, when Planned delivery cost is involved it is giving this kind of entries.
Also I created one more test case, and in that I have not done partial GRN and Partial MIRO. I have done full quantity GRN and full Quantity MIRO. then in this case, system is not hitting 0.01 INR in BSX account key during MIRO. WHY???
Kindly help me out to find the reason of posting 0.01 INR in BSX account key.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Biraj,
In the first invoice posting, you have not completely credited to vendor a/c. Here you have left the balance 0.01. Due to this it posted to inventory A/c. In second invoice posting. you completed charged to vendor a/c, due to this it did not have any posting for inventory a/c. However, have you assigned small difference GL account for the transaction key "DIF" in OBYC? If you define this, then what ever small difference will charge to this account instead of inventory a/c.
Regards,
Mukthar
Hi,
There are lot of reasons for PRD entry getting in MIRO.
In MIGO, if you are getting price difference account means, you are maintained price control as "S" for material and you have maintained price was not matching with PO price.
See below link you will get idea and solution..
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
What is the PO quantity and price?
What is the value on the invoice from your vendor and what did you actually enter in MIRO?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Biraj,
Please check price control of material, whether it is "S" or "V"?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
97 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.