cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Automatic Tax Code Determination for Service PO

0 Kudos

Hello Friends,

Recently we have done condition technique for automatic tax code determination for  Material/Service,

The new Condition table fields are as below:


Condition Type: ZNAV

Access Sequence: Z003

941  - Pur. Org / Import indicator / material tax indicator / Industry Key


This combination is working fine for material but this is not working for SERVICE PO.



Actually I need to include the field "Tax Indicator" Field  In basis data view Of service master NOT Material Master.


We have two field related to  Tax indicator one is for Service Master and another is for Material Master.

Is it possible to include the Tax Indicator Field for SERVICE MASTER record in condition table ?


I have used MEK1 for condition record creation.



Thank you

Rab

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

former_member201529
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Dear Rabindra,

This can be done with material group.

Kindly create new condition table with material group and assign the same with existing access sequence, now you will get two key combination while creating condition record one already existed and another with material group (newly made).


Regards,

Karna J

0 Kudos

Dear Karna,

Thanks for you reply.

I will update the conditions table as below and test it again.

Pur. Org / Import indicator / material tax indicator /SERVICE GROUP/Industry Key


Thank you

Rab

former_member183424
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

In purchase order, system will take the value whatever you will maintain in the PO header and PO line item. System will not take the value of service tab.

You may can try at service pricing procedure, you may can default the tax code at service level by doing the same at service pricing procedure level.

This document may can help

0 Kudos

Hi Dibyendu,

Thank for your reply.

we have two place to maintain conditions one is under ESM and one is under purchasing.

you mean that, he we need to do the changes in ESM part correct?

here we have to user ML51 is that correct?

Thank you

Rab

former_member183424
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Yes. You may can have a look into the document which I have given.