on 02-04-2015 6:30 PM
Hello all,
I have the following mission:
Create a PCR that reads the P0377-BPLAN equals to 'PLAN1' or 'PLAN2' or 'PLAN3'.
If the employee has this infotype, then should check the infotype P0021 where the subtype is equals to '2' and P0021-FGBDT compared to the actual date, should be less than 6 years. If the condition above is true, then should make an ADDWT 9000.
The purpose of this Rule, is to check if the employee has a maternal plan and if his son has less than 6 years old, and then the Wage type inserted in the infotype 15 should be processed.
Thanks,
Ricardo
Hi Ricardo, first at all you have to read the infotype in the schema with the function P0377 then use a rule in which you ask about the plans, so if there are some of the plans you wrote you have to read the infotype 0021 with the operation table, but you hisave to make sure in moment you want to read the infotype it was included, to read the field FGBDT use the operation VARGB
Manuel
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Ricardo for that you can use the operation CPAGE:
CPAGE calculates the age of a person at a certain reference date. The
operation creates the difference from the reference date and the date of
birth. The result is them compared with a specifed number (comparison
age). You can specify the date of birth, reference date, and comparison
age using the operation's syntax.
The operation can only be used in a personnel calculation rule that is
called before function P0021.
utput
Depending on whether the calculated age is greater, less than, or the
same as the comparison age, the operation writes one of three signs <, >
or =, to the variable key.
yntax
OOOOOSVVFX
OOOOO CPAGE Name of operation
S Date of birth
space Employee's date of birth from
Infotype Personal Data (0002)
F D.o.B of family member from
Infotype Family/Related Person (0021)
VV Comparison age
nn Age as number nn
PB Maximum age for insurance from
Infotype VBL/ZVE Data (0051);
only relevant for country version
Germany
F Reference date
space Age at end of year
N Age on first of month
M Age on last of month
V Age on last of preceding month
X possible correction of reference date
+ Age in days plus 1
(for tax)
- Age in days minus 1
(for social insurance)
Use operation CPAGE to deal with the following requirements:
1. CPAGE 65N
The operation compares the employee's age on the first day of the
calendar month in which payroll is run, with 65.
2. CPAGE PBM
The operation compares the employee's age on the last day of the
calendar month in which payroll is run, with the VBL/ZVE-liable age
in infotype VBL/ZVE Data (0051).
3. CPAGEF50
Hope this helps.
MC
Very good Manuel,
I am creating the Rule, but for example we have here:
TABLEP0377
VARGBBPLAN
- PLA1
TABLEP0021
CPAGE07M (IS THIS CORRECT? The dependant of the employee should have less than 7 years old)
* ADDWT *
=
>
- PLA2
TABLEP0021
CPAGE05M (IS THIS CORRECT? The dependant of the employee should have less than 5 years old)
* ADDWT *
=
>
Should I store the value of field FGBDT, or the function CPAGE do this with read automatically?
Cheers,
Ricardo
Hi Ricardo,
I am not sure which country payroll you are using, but it sounds like you might need to create a couple of functions to gather the data you need (get children information from 0021, get plan information from 377 and read the children's data from 0021 for the age calculation referred to earlier in this chain). I feel that all of this enhancement work would be better placed into supporting a process that keeps the entry from happening if the conditions you mention are not met.
I would look at setting up the checks that you are trying to apply in the entry process for the wage type. In a PAI user exit for IT0014 and/or IT0015 execute the checks for the plan and then evaluate the records for children to determine A) if there are any children and B) does any one of the children meet the age criteria. If the criteria are not met (a 377 AND a child under the age of 6 for the periods in question) then you generate an error message. If there are children then determine the latest date of eligibility and do not let the IT be created after that date.
Then - if the wage type exists you can process it as required, it can only be available in payroll if the system allows the creation of the record.
Cheers,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
As far i understand there are ways to accomplish requirement either dynamic action or PCR if you wanted to go with a PCR use below operations to write logic according to your requirement.
else go with dynamic actions concept for your reference go through below links.
While working with system we may have to face different experiences have a look of them if they are feasible go ahead.
Regards
Venkatesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.