How to Change movement type for Raw Material

[Former Member]

Hi,

We want to change the Movement type 103 from 101 during Goods Receipt thru MIGO transaction only for Raw Material.

Is there any config. setting or enhancement required.

Regards.

[busyaban7 · Accepted solution]

To Create inspection plan, you need to go to Tx QP01 -

a. Put your plant = XXXX and enter. In case your inspection plan has internal number range, then that will be picked automatically. Else you can add a 8 - digit code.

b. Add inspection plan text - any description applicable within 40 characters. Though it might not be mandatory, but add it for your reference. Enter.

c. In the inspection plan - Header Details, Put Usage = 5, Status = 4, add unit applicable for your material like PCE, Kg, etc for To Lot Size.

d. Go to Operation's Overview tab, add work center, Control Key (if applicable), add a description of this operation, though not mandatory.

e. Select the operation (Ex, 0010, 0020, etc) and go to "Inspection Characteristics Overview". Select the newly created test MIC and enter. Enter.

f. Go to the inspection plan header. Go to Material Assignment tab and add the Group Counter (Ex 1, 2, 3, etc), add your material number, plant and save this record.

g. Finally save the inspection plan. Now this inspection plan will have MIC added for result recording, and material added so that inspection plan can be picked during inspection lot creation.

Thanks,

Arijit

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Thanks a lot Arijit....

During Point 'e'....after go to "Inspection Characteristics Overview"....MIC number not showing in list...msg showing "No valid version found for master inspection characteristic 1000000"...

I think MIC number created was not correct...there is something wrong with that...

What necessary step or control points, we have to maintain during MIC...

Please suggest...

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

This issue has been solved thru Maintain Release Status during MIC creation....

Now processing further and revert...

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Now Inspection Lot has been created after MIGO Processing with mvt. type 101.

By this process, skipped 103 movement...

Can you please send me steps for MIC creation steps... any extra setting in this step...

Thanks a lot...

[former_member42743 · Accepted solution]

Anil,  your above request was reported by several QM members for a failure ot search.  I've reviewed this thread and the vast majority of it relates to fairly basic QM functionality.

PLEASE read the following blogs:

You were fortunate to catch Jürgen L in a very tolerant mood!!!  🙂

And that Arijit Banerjee spent a lot of time on what are very basic questions.

You now have multiple thread topics in this topic.  Please do some searches and some prototyping in your sandbox system before posting again.

We encourage you to post your technical questions and our members are happy to answer them.  But the creation of a MIC is about as basic to QM as you can get.

Also, please keep your threads on a single topic.  If it leads you to an issue with another technical object, open a new thread and reference the previous thread.

I hope you understand why I am locking this thread.

Craig.

[busyaban7]

Hi Jürgen L,

Please can you move this discussion thread to Quality Management Forum, as this question is more valid there.

Hi Anil,

Please try the below things as per my understanding -

1. Material should have no open things existing (Orders, stocks, etc), before activating QM setup.

2. Activate inspection type "01" in Material Master QM view. Activate the checkbox indicator "post to inspection stock", in case you wish to link the stock. posting with UD.

3. Create a MIC in QS21. Select the control indicator correctly.

4. Create an inspection plan using the MIC created above, select inspection plan usage "5", and link this material to it.

5. Create purchase order and post GR against this order. An inspection lot will be created and linked to the material document.

6. Open Tx QA32/QA33 and find this inspection lot there. Normally I prefer this T code.

7. Update inspection results for this inspection lot.

8. Add UD = "A", to move the stock form Quality to Unrestricted or "R" to move the stock form Quality to blocked stock. If the UD code is background compliant, it will happen automatically, else you need to post the stock manually from inspection stock tab during usage decision posting.

Thanks,

Arijit

[JL23]

Right now it is a process question and only scratching surface,hence I am the opinion that it is still valid for MM, especially when looking at the subject and the initial question. 

[busyaban7]

Yes, you are correct. Thanks.

[Former Member]

Thanks...

As per point no. 4, during Inpection Plant creation, where to use MIC (created thru QS21)...no field is showing there....

Also i want to confirm, that MIC number generated thru QS21, is it correct...

[JL23]

I am moving it now to QM as it is far away from the initial question.

[busyaban7]

Hi Anil,

Jürgen L has correctly answered to your query and you many not need MvT 103. What you can do now is to test a scenario with 101 for RAW materials, by activating inspection type "01" in the material master, post to inspection stock.

Please do remember to do close/clear any open objects like orders, lots, stock, etc in case you are using any old material or test against a new material where these things are not available, as a pre-condition to activate inspection type.

Thanks,

Arijit 

[ravishankar_ramanan]

Hello Anil,

Why are you specific to RAW material, any reason ?

[Former Member]

We want to activate QM in procurement process...and for it, requires 103 movement inplace of 101.

Also we want to activate Quality check on Raw Material only....

[JL23]

your requirements do not need a 103 movement, we do both QM in procurement and QM checks and do not use 103 at all.

103 defines the ownership whether you post into your valuated stock (with 101 or 105 in case of 103) or not. This ownership change is usually subject to your negotiated terms in the purchase order. You neither have a storage location nor an option for a batch in a 103 movement so you should take this into consideration.

[Former Member]

Can we use QM in procurement without 103 movement type???

Means...we activate the QM view in Material Master and through 101 movement type process further. (In case 103/105 not use)

[JL23]

I have my difficulties with these kind of inquiries, what else can I answer as I already did? why does it need to be said twice?

[former_member183424]

You asked : "Can we use QM in procurement without 103 movement type???"

Jurgen Sir wrote : "we do both QM in procurement and QM checks and do not use 103 at all."

[Former Member]

I request you to please tell me steps for procurement process, if we activate QM without 103 movement....

[former_member183424]

You just need to understand the QM process by reading some document from help.sap.com.

Write "QM process" in top right search box and hit on the search glass.

[former_member201529]

Dear Anil,

You can change it manually in MIGO or try the same with following BADI

MB_BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE  (or) MB_MIGO_BADI

Regards,

Karna J

[Former Member]

Change manually of mvt. type will not suitable.

[former_member201529]

Dear Anil,

Then try the same through following Badi

MB_BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE  (or) MB_MIGO_BADI

Regards,

Karna J

[former_member219313]

Hi,

Better to go with Badi (e.g. MB_MIGO_BADI) which is applicable for MIGO transaction and apply validation on Material type......take help of technical person.

One more thing if you are procuring Raw material locally then it is easy to find material type in Excise tab.

Br

Deepak

[former_member183424]

I don't think so there are any standard configuration. Movement type can be set default as per action and references document from MIGO - Settings - Default Values.

But only for some material (like as raw material) is not possible through configuration.

[yang_bai]

Hello Anil,

Would you please let me know if you got any error in MIGO?
Maybe some screenshots of your steps will help me understand the query better.

Regards,

Yang