Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

IDOC and QRFC options in EM

Hi,

We are working on a design aspect where EM is integrated with ECC and TM. i HAVE THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

a) For ECC-EM and TM-EM integration what are the pros and cons of using idoc and qrfc approach.which is the preferred method?

b) secondly is it preferred to have EM server inbuilt within TM and ECC or separate server for both

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

1 Answer

  • Best Answer
    avatar image
    Former Member
    Jan 07, 2015 at 10:25 AM

    Hi Dipak,

    As per my opinion:

    1. QRFC is preferred method when you integrate SAP ECC and SAP TM with SAP EM.  Just check this table as IDOC will not fetch event handler data.  The advantage of using IDOC you can trigger exception handling.  However, qRFC is missing this factor but you can implement CCMS monitoring for queue failures, stuck, Running status for long etc.

    Description

    IDoc Type

    RFC

    BAPI

    Sending event messages

    EVMSTA02

    /SAPTRX/BAPI_EHADDEVENTMSG_02

    1. EventHandler.AddEventMessages02

    Fetching event handler data

    No IDoc available

    /SAPTRX/BAPI_EH_GET_DATA

    1. EventHandler.GetData

    Creating or updating event handlers

    EHPOST01

    /SAPTRX/BAPI_EH_POST

    1. EventHandler.PostEventHandler

    Source: SAP

    2. There was a discussion on this and Stefan confirmed that we can have SAP EM on SAP TM SAP Netweaver box.  However, prefer to have it as separate server (due to volume of events processing) or at least separate client on SAP TM.  This rule also applies to SAP ECC but if you are using both SAP ECC and SAP TM then preferable would be on SAP TM box.  Also check this article SAP Event Management - Six Key Things To Consider During Server Sizing.

    Also, you can wait for other members comment, they can also give you some insights on this.

    Regards

    GGOPII

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded