on 01-06-2015 5:19 PM
Hi All,
While using costing sheet for calculating OH, can we use the values posted through settlement cost elements -21 as base to calculate overhead.
For example i have WBS settled with SCE 870001 (Type 21) with value 1000 and i want to calculate OH at 10$ on 1000 - 100$.
Yes i can re run ra later and settle it again.
So question is whether type 21 can be used as a base to calculate Overhead using costing sheet.
Regards
Aravind
Hi
I am following this thread interestingly...My view is , OH calculation base is only includes CE cat which are participating in cost postings in CCtr level ...may be primary and secondary. But settlement CE is not used for cost posting to CCtr rather used for settle the cost to other object and these costs are already booked through primary CEs in the sender objects..
So system is doing rightly
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello All,
I figured out that Catergory 21 in base is not an issue, if i post manual entry thru KB15N debit WBS with Cat 21 CE and run CJ44 after settlement it is calculating overhead but if the same SCE with Cat 21 is posted values in WBS (Business transaction KOAO) it is not considering for calculating OH.
SO i think the issue is the Business transaction KOAO is not considered for calculating OH not the Cost element Category.
Dear Aravind,
Cost elements of every kind can be included in the calculation base for Overhead Costing sheets.
Also cost elements from cost category 21.
Kind regards
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
In Base Z100 i have 2 Cost elements range one with Category 21 and another 1 it is calculating for 1 but not for 21 i tried with Category 43 also it is calculating but not only for 21.
I have value posted - settlement for the object which i am running in Cat 21. Any specific setting to be taken care ?
Dear Aravind,
i do not know of any specific setting.
one reason might be that cost element of Type 21 in the calculation base and cost element used for the overhead settlement are the same.
If that is the case, try with a different cost element for the settlement.
Settlement rule is defined in the credit.
Kind regards
User | Count |
---|---|
97 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.