cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

0.10 RM amount error, if 3 actions exists in same pay period

Former Member
0 Kudos

Friends,

Any one has idea why this type error appearing in Payslip.

EX: If 3 or more personal actions exists in same pay period, in payslip it's displaying 0.10 RM less amount. Please suggest.

Regards,

Rajesh

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

former_member193210
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

First, please confirm that the problem is only in the Remuneration Statement (PaySlip) and that the data is accurate/correct in the Results Table of the Payroll Results Cluster.

Is the problem with an "Earnings" WT, a "Deduction" WT, or an "Information" WT?

What are the values and splits of the problematic WT in the Results Table?

Are the 3 splits in the Current Pay or in a Retroactive Pay?

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Remi Corriveau,

The error in payslip only, it's showing only for earning WT's. RT & WPBP tables everything good. sometimes it's showing in -Ve 0.01. you can find the

same in attachment.

former_member193210
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Is it possible that these are variations generated by retroactive payroll calculations?

If these "Tgk" lines are not in the RT of the current pay, try using the WageType Reporter to see where they are comming from.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Remi,

The TGK results not appearing in RT Table, ran the WT Reporter, it's displaying like this. but i am unable to find out from which tables these error appearing.

former_member193210
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

The WT Reporter indicates that the 0.01- variation for WT 7200 comes from Payroll Period 201411.

For WT 7200, please compare the RT of PP 201411 in 201411 to those of PP 201411 in 2014212.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Remi,

compared previous payroll Results in CRT table, it's appearing only in CRT. First it's forming M, next Q & Y values when bonus payment through IT 15, But don't know why that's impacting on Basic Pay (IT 😎 WT.

do we need to delete & recreate the MQY cumulations or any other solutions. Let me know the possible solutions

former_member193210
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Changes in RT should be reflected in CRT.

What are the values for WT 7200 in PP 201411 for 201411 in the RT, and

what are the values for WT 7200 in PP 201411 for 201412 in the RT?

Your screen capture seems to indicate that there is a variation of -0.01 between the 2 results.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Remi,

the IN & For PP values for both are same for WT 7200 & Same for 11 & 12 periods. Client made payment in Aug 14, with that only M,Q,Y values updated & finally in 12 Period it displayed as 0.01 RM.

Can you tell me how to edit RT Table values.