Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

Sub-transactions in schema ZCASCHEMA1 step 0001 inconsistent

When I try to run a invoice using ESIBI, error occurs as "Sub-transactions in schema XXXX step 0001 inconsistent". the error message details are below. I configured the main and sub transactions correctly in EK 01 and EKA01. I am not able to understand whether the issue is in FICA area or Billing. Appreciate the help. You are billing a contract with the following data: o  Company code:              MS00. o  Division:                  20. o  Account determination ID:  01. o  Main transaction:          0100. These fields and the sub-transactions from the schema steps are used to define the tax determination code in billing. In each schema step, the debit sub-transaction and the credit sub-transaction must produce the same tax determination code. In addition, the tax determination code cannot be blank. In schema ZCASCHEMA1, step 0001, this is not the case: Debit/credit        Sub-transaction      Tax determination code Debit                0021 Credit              0011

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

2 Answers

  • Jan 02, 2015 at 09:30 AM

    Hi Arvind.

    Assuming that you have configured IMG - Financial Accounting(new) - Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable - Basic Functions - Postings and Documents - Document - Maintain Document Assignments - Define Sales/Purchase Tax Determination (defined tax codes you will use in FI-CA / Billing and linked them with the FTXP tax codes), you need to check the sub transactions in your schema ZCASCHEMA1 (transaction EA35, schema steps, fields DST and CST; in your case they are 0021 and 0011) and verify that you have the same tax code for the both of them. If tax options can not be applied (i.e. the subtransactions are tax irrelevant), then use such indicator, as the indicator in the above configuration must exist.

    Marko

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Jan 02, 2015 at 02:08 PM

    Arvind:

    The message provides the solution.  This thread is locked.

    regards,

    bill.

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded