We're looking at implementing Service Master within our organization, and I'm trying to explain Service Master as a concept/idea to folks within the organization. It seems one of the best ways to communicate how Service Master will work is to relate the data fields to what exists in Material Master. Right now, I'm using the following analogies to explain the data hierarchy within Service Master:
Service Category = Material Type
Service Group = Material Group (identical)
Service Type = Material Class
SSC Item(s) = Material Classification Characteristics
Are these appropriate analogies? Or are there better ways to draw comparisons between the fields?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.