Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

need to block inter company vendor invoice posting for some FB60

Hi All,

Requirement is to block intercompany vendor invoice posting for certain users.

During intercompany vendor invoice posting. These invoice postings need to be restricted for some users and some need to be given authorisation.

However, checked the possibility of creating role or profile for authorisation in SU02, PFCG etc. But it will block other users posting FB60 permanently. is there any other way to block for some and unblock for some users ?

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Assigned Tags

Related questions

3 Answers

  • Posted on Dec 04, 2014 at 05:02 PM

    Hello Pramod,

    I believe that

    1. using authorisation object F_LFA1_BEK in the vendor master,
    2. updating/creating a new role with the same value,
    3. and making sure that no other role has an asterisk in it

    is indeed the best solution.

    Best Regards,


    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Posted on Dec 07, 2014 at 12:02 AM

    Hi Pramod,

    Yes, you can. You can create a validation rule by GGB0 tcode, including these users in data set that can post the invoice.


    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Hi JPA, Thanks for the reply..

      data set already been created and no errors while inserting validation rule..

      in pre-requisite, I have linked inter company with vendors and in 'check' linked the authorised users

      by giving their user it is working fine- like authorised users are able to post intercompany invoice using fb60 and all others are restricted by using this intercompany posting.

      Now the issue is, I wanted to create a set . In that set, all those users who can be given authorisation

      need to be added in the set. and that set name, need to be inserted in the validation rule under 'check'. ALthough, I have created a set and inserted in the validation rule, but still the users mentioned in the set are not given authorisation.

      That is mainly because, I am unable to find the appropriate table and field name given in the set.

      as of now I have given BKPF & USNAM in the set. and mentioned one user name (for authorisation)however, that user is not able to post. because table is not mapped properly in set..

      Therefore, pleas let me know the appropriate table name & field name for providing it in the set.

      Pls note- these set in future will help to include N number of users to provide authorisation and even block them by deleting their user name..else, giving user name in check would be enough to provide autho:..

  • Posted on Dec 07, 2014 at 04:52 AM


    Now I can't understand the question. Please, be more clear. Remember that USNAM is the name of technical field for the user.


    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member


      I need to create a set (GS01) that shows table, Field name & from Value.

      this set will be defined in GGB0 under check..

      now, in this set, I need to define a table and field name ( eg-BKPF & USNAM) and in value field - User ID . These USer id will be given authorisation for intercompany posting..

      now which table & fieldname need to be given for user authorisation. BKPF & USNAM, BKPF-SNAM & SYST-uname is not helping..

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.